從羅蘭巴特（R.Barthes）的符號學解讀政治論述的意義－以蔡英文主席的「和而不同、和而求同」為例

論文摘要民進黨蔡英文主席提出了「和而不同，和而求同」兩岸論述。本文引用巴特的符號學解讀蔡英文兩岸政治論述的意義。本文包含以下研究目的：首先，簡介巴特的符號學，尤其不僅會指出巴特的符號學的意義分析模式，而且也會指出其對本研究的如下意涵：一個政治論述可被視為一個被人符碼化的符號。其次，說明我國政黨的兩岸論述，尤其聚焦於說明「和而不同，和而求同」的提出背景與相關內容。第三，解讀「和而不同，和而求同」的意義。這主要是引用巴特的符號學的意義分析模式作為解讀的意義，其中包括直接意指與三種文化意義（即含蓄意指、迷思與象徵）。第四，反思。這一方面是指出，筆者在主觀上比較偏向於哪一種文化意義，以及其中理由，另一方面則是指出，巴特的符號論對於筆者的啟示，這尤其是對於筆者在解讀新聞與人生觀上的啟示。

關鍵字

和而不同、和而求同；符號學；蔡英文；羅蘭巴特

並列摘要

The chairwoman Ing-Wen Tsai proposed a new formulation for the cross-strait political discourse, the so-called "The harmonious and not clannish, clannish and not harmonious". This thesis employs semiotics of R. Barthes to be a theoretical foundation. This thesis contains the following research purposes. Firstly, I introduce Barthes' Semiotics, in particular, I point out not only the contents of Barthes's Semiotic analysis model, but also its implications in this study, which are as follows: a political discourse can be seen as an encodes sign. Secondly, I describe the development of the cross-strait political discourses in political parties in Taiwan, and it especially focuses on the background and relevant content of " The harmonious and not clannish, clannish and not harmonious" . Thirdly, I interpret "The harmonious and not clannish, clannish and not harmonious" by means of Barthes’ Semiotic analysis model. Its meaning-structure includes denotation on the language level and three cultural meanings (connotation, myth and symbol) on the mythology level. Fourthly, I make a reflection on the engagement in this thesis. In this aspect, I express which cultural meaning I prefer and the reason on the one hand, and I get what kind of inspiration from Barthes’ Semiotics , especially for my philosophy on life and my interpretation on news, on the other hand.