兩岸大學生的國族認同：以Q方法論檢視

The Cross-Strait College Students of National Identity: A Q Methodology Study

呂承泰(Cheng-Tai Lu)

指導教授 ： 孫同文

國立暨南國際大學/人文學院/公共行政與政策學系/碩士(2014年)

https://doi.org/10.6837/NCNU.2014.00314

摘要

自從1949年國民政府播遷來臺，兩岸從此展開了漫長的對峙與政治分治，雙方相隔海峽分治持續至今日，爭吵不休的國家對外名號至今曾未間斷過，更令人廣為言語的國家存亡問題，也是沸沸揚揚的爭論議題，為何一個曾經帶動臺灣經濟起飛，以及讓臺灣人民享有多項自由權的國家，現今卻面臨人民對國族認同上的挑戰。1987年11月前總統蔣經國先生開放一般民眾赴大陸探親，也從此拉開兩岸關係交流上的序幕，隨著探親的開端，陸陸續續也開放兩岸之間的間接貿易投資、放寬兩岸之間學術、文化、體育等活動的交流。2010年立法院通過陸生三法修正案，採認大陸學歷，開放大陸學生於2011年起可來臺就學，兩岸學生可以更進一步的在生活上首度共同彼此交流。藉此利基，本研究希望透過大陸學生在與臺灣學生共同生活過後，所產生的各方面所有意識，藉由Q方法論以圖片象徵方式，對其20位的兩岸大學生受訪者進行分析，發現其中存在四種論述，分別為自由臺灣主體展現論；兩岸中華文化統合論；中華民族的兩岸共同想像論；大陸主體展現論。或許兩岸大學生的這四種論述，未來交流上更加頻繁，可能是影響兩岸間重要的政策走向。

關鍵字

國族認同 ； 陸生來臺 ； 圖片象徵 ； Q方法論

並列摘要

Since the Nationalist government moved to Taiwan in 1949, the two sides have launched a long confrontation with the political divide and conquer. As a result, the Straits of governance has continued until today. The name has been arguing without stopping, and the most controversial issue is the survival issue. The country which economic developed rapidly and people had democracy before, but now has to face the question of national identity from its people. On November 1987, former President Chiang Ching-kuo lifted the ban of the general public visiting their relatives in China, this move is the beginning of exchange between two sides, after that more and more activities are relieved such as business trade, culture, sport and scholarship etc. . The Legislative Yuan passed the amendment terrestrial three methods in 2010, the degree in Mainland China was accepted, Mainland China students could attend schools in Taiwan in 2011. Thus, students in Taiwan and Mainland China could communicate with each other in their school lives. In this study, we hope we could get the thought of Mainland China students, after they lived with Taiwanese students. Using the picture symbolization in Q methodology, we visited 20 students in Taiwan or Mainland China as respondents to analyze their response. We found out four points: namely the freedom to show Taiwan's main theory; cross-strait unification theory of Chinese culture; common vision on both sides of the Chinese nation; Mainland China theory to show respectively. Perhaps four points of college students in both sides would make exchanges become more frequent in the future, it may be important to influence policy direction between the two sides.

並列關鍵字

National Identity ； Mainland China Students to Taiwan ； Graphic Symbol ； Q Methodology

參考文獻

中文部分

論文期刊

王昌甫（1998）。〈族群意識、民族主義與政黨支持：一九九○年代臺灣的族群政治〉，《臺灣社會科學研究》，第2期：頁1-14。

王家英、孫同文（1996）。〈國族認同的解體與重構─臺灣當前的主體經驗〉，《政治科學論叢》，第7期：頁321-354。

方凱弘、陳揚中（2014）。〈Q方法論在公共行政領域研究上之應用〉，「2014年臺灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會（TASPAA）國際學術研討會」，臺北：臺灣公共行政與公共事務系所聯合會。