公益勸募條例法制化與社會福利型非營利組織募款責信度之影響分析

The Legislation of the Charitable Fundraising Law and The effect of the Social Welfare Non-profit Organization Fundraising Accountability.

吳秀玲(Hsiu-Ling Wu)

指導教授 ： 江大樹

國立暨南國際大學/人文學院/公共行政與政策學系/碩士(2010年)

摘要

本研究係從非營利組織興起發展背景著手，以責信度觀點探究社會福利型非營利組織在相關法律規範變遷過程中，對其募款實務運作所產生之影響，分別針對公益勸募條例法制化歷程，及對於社會福利型非營利組織募款責信度產生之影響做分析。研究方法部分，則採取質性研究途徑，以「文獻分析法」與「深度訪談法」取得分析資料：文獻分析部分以包含非營利組織、募款及責信度相關專書、期刊、報章雜誌及碩博士論文等次級資料為主；深度訪談部分，訪談對象之選取係從「內政部社會司公益勸募管理系統」網站內所登載資料為母群體，輔以雪球抽樣方式增加受訪機率。研究途徑係以責信度做切入焦點，區分為內部責信度與外部責信兩部分，前者係指募款責信度，包括：組織使命、內部職工專業能力以及組織運作模式等面向；後者以公益勸募條例及其相關子法規範內容為主，包含申請勸募活動之事前程序、勸募活動進行中、勸募活動結束後以及罰則等四部份。
其次，募款法制化歷程將以統一捐募運動辦法時期、公益勸募條例立法過程以及該條例與相關子法之規範內容為探討內容，藉此了解相關法規範之立法背景、目的、各草案內容比較以及立法推動歷程。另外，也針對「內政部社會司公益勸募管理系統」網站登載資料做統計分析，包括一般性分析、勸募團體、公益目的與勸募狀態等四項分類。最後，則綜合上述探討內容，輔以訪談資料進行分析，歸納他律規範與自律機制之相關性，並據此提出若干研究發現與政策建議。

關鍵字

公益勸募條例 ； 非營利組織 ； 募款 ； 責信度

並列摘要

In this study, the rise of developing from Non-profit Organization started, with view of Accountaibility for Social Welfare Non-profit Organization explore of degree of perspective-based norms in the relevant laws change process, appearing among fundraising practice effects arising from the operations respectively for the legalization of the Charitable Fundraising Law and Social Welfare Non-profit Organizations for fundraising accountability to do the analysis of the effect produced. On research methods, it takes qualitative research approach in order to “document analysis” and the “depth interview”; Literature review include secondary data such about Non-profit Organization, Fundraising and Accountability books, periodicals, magazines and newspapers Dissertation; interviews of selected line objects from the “Department of Social Affairs, Ministry of The Interior, Charitable Fundraising Management System” posted on the website information for population, supplemented by snowball sampling to increase the probability of respondents. Research approaches focus on accountability, it’s divided into internal accountability and external accountability two parts, the former means the fund-raising accountability, including: organizational mission, internal staff expertise and organizational mode of operation; The latter to the Charitable Fundraising Law, the Charitable Fundraising Law- Implementation Regulations and the Charitable Fundraising Law-permit regulations, including charity donations activities for the prior program, during the period of charity donations activities, after the charity donations activities finished and penalties after the end of the four parts.
Second, this study will investigate the Regulations of consolidated donation, legislative process about the Charitable Fundraising Law, the Charitable Fundraising Law- Implementation Regulations and the Charitable Fundraising Law-permit regulations. Understanding of relevant legal norms to the legislative background, objectives, compare the contents of the drafts and promoting process. Alternatively, for “Department of Social Affairs, Ministry of the Interior, Charitable Fundraising Management System” published on its website information for statistical analysis, including the general analysis, fund-raising groups, for purpose of social welfare, and fund-raisers in the state.
Finally, the contents of the above study, supplemented by interview data were analyzed, summarized external accountability and the relevant self-regulatory mechanism, and made a number of research findings and policy recommendations.

並列關鍵字

Charitable Fundraising Law ； Non-profit Organization ； Fundraising ； Accountability

參考文獻

一、中文部分

內政部社會司，2008，〈「公益勸募條例」巡迴座談會議資料匯整表〉，《公益勸募條例施行細則暨公益勸募許可辦法施行週年建議座談會手冊》：內政部社會司。

王致棠，2003，《臺灣非營利組織法制化之研究─以文化創意活動為核心》，台北： 台灣大學法律學研究所碩士論文。

王振軒，2006，〈建構非政府組織的募款能力〉，《非政府組織學刊》，創刊號：117-138。

王順民，1999，〈非營利組織及其相關議題的討論-兼論台灣地區非營利組織的構造意義〉，《社區發展季刊》，58：36-59。