王翬作品鑑別與市場價格之研究

Indentification and Market Value of Wang Hui’s Works

王政松(WANG CHENG SUNG)

指導教授 ： 江明賢

國立臺灣師範大學/藝術學院/美術學系在職進修碩士班/碩士(2006年)

摘要

過往對於古代書畫名家作品的研究，大多停留在理論分析的階段，但隨著藝術理論的探討逐漸趨向精緻化和高精確性後，純理論研究似乎已經不能滿足求知者之需求；另一方面，由於書畫市場的熱絡，使得關於鑑別方面的書籍大行其市，但是這些名為鑑別的專業叢書，多是虛有其名，所談內容未能針對個別畫家進行精細的技術探討，不免讓人有「說的多，有用者少；談得容易，鑑定困難」的感覺。
筆者所提出的王翬研究，經由排比分析兩岸故宮和上海博物館所藏的王翬作品，歸納出一些技術上的規則性，這些發現不僅有助於驗證王翬的繪畫理論，對於書畫的購買者而言，也提供了有效的真偽判定參考。本文的內容從「春山飛瀑」的雙胞案談起，「雙胞案」讓我們認識了偽作的特徵，更肯定了鑑別程序的重要。先說明王翬的交遊情況，再經由王翬標準本的確立，為往後的技術分析做好準備；在技術分析中，針對一些常見的繪畫元素作出比較，這些元素有「設色習慣」、「枯樹枝椏」、「竹子」、「人物」、「建築物和白雲」，並將王翬的書法特徵、印鑑和字號的使用做了全面的整理，最後以技術分析所得結論，驗證＜溪山紅樹圖軸＞、＜雲山競秀圖卷＞等高知名度的王翬作品；驗證的結果，可能會打破大家原先的想法。
在市場的部份，探討了清初、清中、清末、和1980年以後的王翬市場型態；利用1995年以後，中國大陸的拍賣成交資料和一些經濟數據，做成相關研究。在此同時分析王翬十大高價作品，得知影響當今王翬作品價格之因素；在市場分析的最後，探討購買王翬畫作時所面臨的問題，提醒大家愈高價之王翬作品愈具購買風險，希望藉由技術的分析，讓我們能清楚了解王翬作品特徵，降低市場購買者的風險。更期望研究成果，能為後續研究者提供正確的資料與方向，為完備藝術史盡一份心力。

關鍵字

王翬 ； 鑑定 ； 真偽 ； 目鑑 ； 考鑑 ； 元素 ； 書畫 ； 價格

並列摘要

Regarding passing ancient times calligraphy and painting famous expert work research were mostly pauses in the theoretical analysis stage, even these theoretical analysis tends to fine and the high accuracy, it still useless to settle the real & false authentication problem. On the other hand, as a result of calligraphy and painting market popularity, causes named authenticate specialized collections books are prevalence, however, this kind of empty books discussed the content has not make the fine technical discussion, unavoidably lets many people feeling “Said too much, useful few; Discussed easily, carried out difficulty.” This research is provides leadership above, for improves the situation to go out first step.

In this Wang Huei studies, analyzes both Imperial Palace and the Shanghai museum institute collection of Wang Huei’s works by way of the parallelism and then observes Wang Huei in the technical regularity, these discoveries not only is helpful to the Wang Huei fundamental research, for the calligraphy and painting buyer also has provided the effective determination foundation. This article content from “Chuen Shan Fei Pu " the twins document mentions, "The twins document" let us know the forgery characteristic and has affirmed the importance of authenticate procedure. From Wang Huei makes friends situation again by way of Wang Huei standard establishment will prepare for in the future technical analysis. In the technical analysis, makes the comparison in view of some common drawing elements, this elements have "the tinting habit", "the dead tree branch", "the bamboo", "the character", "the building and the white clouds" with Wang Huei’s calligraphy characteristic, seal and name use have done the comprehensive reorganization, finally uses as obtained confirms as the conclusion , ….etc. the well-knownness Wang Huei’s works. The confirmation result possibly can break the all people’s original thought.

In the market part, the discussion is settle at the beginning of, the middle of, the end of the Ching Dynasty and in 1980 later the Wang Huei market condition, using 1995 after, mainland China auction deal material and some economical data to make the correlation research, in the same time to analyzes the ten great high prices of Wang Huei’s works and knew the present age affects factor of the Wang Huei’s work price, In market analysis final, proposed purchases question which the Wang Huei painting faces and reminds everyone to recover the high price of Wang Huei’s work to have the purchase risk, hoped in accordance with the painting technical analysis, enables us clearly to understand the Wang Huei’s work characteristic then reduces the market risk for the buyer, finally, expected the research results can provide the correct material and the direction for the following researcher and then to try my personal best for constructs the construction to be complete part of artistic history.

並列關鍵字

Wang Huei ； Authentication ； Real & false ； Eye authentication ； Explore authentication ； element ； Calligraphy and painting ； Price

參考文獻

32. 蘇利文(Michael Sullivan)，曾堉、王寶蓮編譯《中國藝術史》，台北：南天書局，1992。

6. 魏可欣，《從尚意到復古：趙孟堅書法之研究》，國立台灣大學藝術史研究所碩士論文，2006。

一、文獻資料

1. 阮元，《石渠隨筆》。

2. 周亮工，《讀畫錄》。