大臺北地區教師職業聲望及其影響因素之調查研究

A SURVEY STUDY OF THE OCCUPATIONAL PRESTIGE OF TEACHERS AND THE CAUSE FACTORS

劉志賢(Liu Chih-shien)

指導教授 ： 簡茂發

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育學系在職進修碩士班/碩士(2008年)

摘要

摘要
本研究旨在瞭解大臺北地區之教師職業聲望及其影響因素，並探討不同背景個人變項的國中教師及家長，對於教師職業聲望及其影響因素看法上的差異，進一步比較分析本研究發現與林清江研究結果，藉以觀察我國教師職業聲望之演變。依據研究目的，本研究採問卷調查法，研究者主要參考林清江1991年「教師職業聲望與專業地位調查問卷」，配合社會發展酌以增修，編製「大臺北地區教師職業聲望及其影響因素之調查問卷」。研究對象以臺北市、臺北縣公立國民中學教師及家長為母群體，分層隨機抽樣31所公立國中之251位教師、620家長，進行問卷調查，調查所得資料，經過「次數分配與百分比分析」、「平均數與標準差分析」、「Spearman等級相關考驗」、「Kendall和諧係數考驗」等進行資料分析與處理，獲致研究結果。本研究主要發現如下：
一、大臺北地區教師依然擁有崇高職業聲望。
二、教師職業聲望之不同居住地區評比結果一致予高層次肯定。
三、不同背景問卷填答者，對各類教師職業聲望的評定均高居第一、第二層次。
四、「工作性質是否符合專業標準」是評比一般職業聲望之最具影響力因素，這是有別於歷屆研究之重要發現。
五、不同背景問卷填答者，對於影響一般職業聲望評比因素看法大致相同。
六、「教師工作意義與價值」是評比教師職業聲望最有影響力因素，證明教育是神聖的事業。
七、不同背景問卷填答者，對於影響教師職業聲望評比因素看法一致。
八、與林清江研究結果比較，發現教育人員職業聲望歷久不衰，證明「尊師重道」深植人心。
基於上述研究結果，本研究提出建議，提供教育行政機關及教育工作者，制訂、執行教育政策或後續教育研究之重要參考。

關鍵字

教師 ； 職業聲望 ； 教師職業聲望

並列摘要

Abstract
The research was aimed at continuing that of Qing-Jiang Lin to realize the occupational prestige of teachers and the cause factors, and to explore differences of views of the occupational prestige of teachers and the cause factors of personal variables of backgrounds of teachers and parents of junior high schools. By observing the development of occupational prestige of teachers, the comparison and analysis of the results of this and Lin’s studies were made. Based on the goal of this research, the method of questionnaire survey was adopted . The researcher designed “Questionnaire Survey of The occupational prestige of teachers and the cause factors”, mainly referring to “Questionnaire Survey of the occupational prestige of teachers and the occupational status, 1991” designed by Qing-Jiang Lin, and made modification in accordance with social development. The population included teachers and parents of public junior high schools in Taipei city and county. There were 251 teachers and 620 parents of 31 public junior high schools chosen to carry out the survey by stratified random sampling. The results were acquired through “Frequency Distribution and Percentage Analysis”, “Means and Standard Deviation Analysis”, “Spearman’s Coefficient of Rank Correlation Test”, ” Kendall’s Coefficient of Concordance Test” to analyze the information obtained by the survey.
The major findings of this study were summarized as follows:
1. Teachers in Taipei area still possess lofty prestige.
2. The results of assessment to occupational prestige of teachers in different living places were high rank consistent.
3. The results of assessment to occupational prestige of teachers by different background people were consistent in the first and second rank.
4. “If occupational quality is accordant with professional criterion.” was the most influencing factor of assessing occupational prestige of average professions, which was an important finding different with previous studies.
5. The results of assessment to occupational prestige by average professions from different background were consistent.
6. “Working significance and value” was the most influencing factor of assessing occupational prestige of teachers, which, improves the fact that educational career was sacred.
7. The assessment to occupational prestige of teachers from different background were consistent in attitudes.
8. Compared with results of Qing-Jiang Lin’s study, it was found that occupational prestige of educators was always high, improving that the belief of “To honor one’s teachers, to adhere to ethic rules” has been deeply rooted in people’s minds.
Based on the findings above, this study proposed suggestions to provide administrative office of education and educators important reference for educational policy drawn up, implementing or sequential educational research.

並列關鍵字

Teacher ； Occupational Prestige ； Occupational Prestige of Teacher

參考文獻

王淑俐（1996）。為師最樂。臺北：南宏。

毛治國（2003）。決策。臺北：天下雜誌。

呂碧琴（2004）。大專院校體育教師之社會地位與階級認同研究。大專體育學刊，6(2)，43-55。

林清江（1980）。臺北市教師職業聲望與專業形象之調查研究。臺北市：國立台灣師範大學教育研究所。

莊靜宜（2000）。資訊職業訓練對社會地位取得之影響：以資訊軟體人才培訓專案受訓者為例。資訊社會研究（2），59-92。