透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.119.136.235
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


摘 要 在地理區位上而言,臺北市、臺北縣與基隆市三地是一個相當完整的地理行政區,從該地區居民的來往互動,可見之間的交流頻繁。今日這三個行政區各扮演著不同功能,相互支援經濟發展與建設,成為一個獨立的發展的都會區域。該區原是一個完整的行政區域,後因希望精華區能來帶動週邊地帶的經濟發展,而將臺北市、基隆市劃分出去,以致形成今日該區分屬為三個縣市政府狀態。 在臺灣地理區劃歷史中,將近50餘年未有太大變化,在全球化的潮流之下,為使國家能統合運用區域內經濟資源,並解決跨區域合作事務問題,地方行政機關與學者即著手研究臺北市、臺北縣與基隆市三個縣市行政區域合併計畫,期以北部三縣市能整合成一行政區,以解決區域重整及跨域治理等問題,進而匯聚成足夠經濟能量,產生卓越的經濟力,期能在國際上佔有競爭優勢。 本文藉由文獻分析、參考美、日所運用之理論與實際經驗,並透過與該三地區行政、立法機關人員及學者專家深度訪談,試圖獲得他們想法,藉以探究及研擬適用於未來所能接受的大臺北都會市的組織架構方式。

關鍵字

縣市合併 北北基 區域合併

並列摘要


In geography, Taipei City, Taipei County and Keelung City are altogether a very complete administrative district. We can see how close they are by observing the interaction between people of these three cities. At present, these three districts play different roles to support economic development and construction to each other. They become an independent and developing metropolitan area. This area was a complete administrative district originally. In order to promote economic development of neighboring areas, this area was being divided into three independent municipalities. In the history of Taiwan geographic area allocation, there have been no large changes in recent 50 years. In the trend of globalization, government wish to integrate with all economic resources in this area and resolve problems of intersection cooperation. As a result, local administration and scholars start to study the plan of consolidation of Taipei City, Taipei County and Keelung City. They hope this consolidation can resolve some problems such as districts restructuring and cross-region management then make this area more energetic and powerful in economy and have more competitivenesses in the international society. This essay referred to analysis of some records, theory and experience of United States and Japan, and interviewed with local public officers, legislators, experts and scholars to know their thoughts. By doing these, we can find out and establish the best organization and structure of Taipei-Keelung metropolitan area.

參考文獻


孔憲法(2006),〈都市計畫與區域治理〉,《都市及區域治理》,臺北:五南。
江大樹(2000a),〈行政區劃與府際關係的相互影響性〉,《中國地方自治》,54(6),頁13-26。
李長晏,曾淑娟(2007),〈台中縣市合併升格直轄市後的府際關係建構〉,台中縣市合併升格直轄市學術研討會,臺中:東海大學。
席代麟(2009)〈三都十五縣談臺灣行政區劃〉《中國地方自治》,第62卷,第1期,頁4-21。
紀俊臣(2006),《都市及區域治理》,臺北:五南。

被引用紀錄


陳世儀(2011)。縣市改制直轄市後區級組織定位之研究以新北市淡水區為例〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.00080
蔡智潁(2015)。基隆何去何從?--從生活世界的觀點論北北基合併議題〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2015.11162
蘇榮原(2014)。縣市合併後鎮民代表改制與地方政治生態分析 ---以台南市佳里區為例〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613583121

延伸閱讀