透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.14.253.152
  • 學位論文

導入惡魔代言人策略的線上社群合作論證系統之研究

A collaborative argumentation system for online communities implementing “devil’s advocate” strategy

指導教授 : 邱瓊慧
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在發展一支援惡魔代言人策略的線上社群合作論證系統。本研究經由線上合作論證、論證系統及惡魔代言人策略的研究中,探討並歸納出線上社群合作應有的形式以及惡魔代言人應有的行為後,規劃、建置一合作論證系統。本研究透過軟體測試、有經驗者測試、及使用者測試,以評估本系統的軟體品質、內容效度、與優使性。評估結果指出,本系統能夠有效的支援具大規模論述量的合作論證以及支援惡魔代言人策略,學生願意使用本系統進行合作論證活動;本研究同時針對評估結果詳細的加以討論,提出未來系統改善與相關研究的建議。

並列摘要


A web-based learning system supporting the “devil’s advocate” strategy toward online communities has been developed to facilitate collaborative argumentation activities. In this study, the pedagogical basis underlying the design and the various functions embedded in the system are explained in the light of argument theory. The software alpha test in terms of the white-box test and black-box test has been executed to establish the quality of programming and logical correctness. The software beta test has been conducted to analyze to what extent the system meets the users’ demand. Participants of this beta test are external consultants who are experienced with argumentation and computer education and external students who belong to the target user of this software. A preliminary study involving 100 sixth-grade students to evaluate the usability and the instructional potential of the system has been conducted. Results taken from questionnaires revealed that students are favorable to the system’s interface design and potentials in promoting their argumentative capability in the applied content domain. Data analysis further indicated that students feel the system has fluent navigation but appeal relative low affect to learn. Guidelines pertaining to instructional implementation are offered.

參考文獻


Andrews, R. (2005). Models of argumentation in educational discourse. Text, 25(1), 107-127.
Bell, P., & Linn, M. C. (2000). Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: Designing for learning from the web with KIE. International Journal of Science Education, 22(8), 797- 817.
Bertucci, A., Conte, S., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2010). The impact of size of cooperative group on achievement, social support, and self-esteem. Journal of General Psychology, 137(3), 256-272.
Branon, R. F., & Essex, C. (2001). Synchronous and asynchronous communication tools in distance education: A survey of instructors. TechTrends, 45(1), 36-42.
Campos, M. N. (2007). Communication as argumentation: The use of scaffolding tools by a networked nursing community. Canadian Journal of Communication, 32(3), 457-474.

延伸閱讀