教學模組之教材開發與評量設計及其成效之探究

江清俊(Ching-Chung Chiang)

指導教授 ： 洪志明

國立臺灣師範大學/理學院/化學系/碩士(2003年)

摘要

本研究基於STS精神與九年一貫課程，以開發學生生活問題問中心的教學模組為主要之目的。兩個研究者設計的教學模組主題分別是煙火與玻璃。未達到多元評量的目的，研究者設計與模組內容相符且具有實用性的多面向評量工具，包括量測學生對於知識理解的科學概念測驗，檢驗學生過程技能表現的過程技能量表，以及探查學生對於模組學習態度感受的學習情意問卷。經由實際課堂中模組學習活動的進行，評量學生學習表現，更進一步反省模組的設計方向。
研究結果顯示，學生在經過模組教學後的知識層面有顯著的進步。過程技能表現，仍以傳統教育所培養的資料閱讀能力為最佳，而各種STS亟欲培養學生的能力表現不如預期，類似的學習活動應更長期的執行才可能使學生在技能表現上有較好的結果。情意態度問卷結果顯示學生多對於模組表達了正面的看法，但受到教學研究時間為暑假的影響，學生選擇無意見的趨中化情形嚴重，學生表現的心態可能無法與正規課程時間相比擬的。研究者建議，模組的設計除包含學生感興趣的動手做活動，更應增加促使學生解決問題動機的設計。若能將模組結合現今課程內容並長期執行於正規的課堂上，才較能夠顯得出模組的實際效益。

關鍵字

STS ； 教學模組

並列摘要

According to STS-spirit and the Nine-Year-Joint Curricula Plan, the purpose of this research was to design teaching modules which were developed from the questions around the students' lives. The two modules inclueded in the research were firework and glass, respectively. In order to fill in multiple-assessments, the researcher evolved assorted assessment tools that were practical and in accordance with the content of the modules. They were science-concept test, process-skill scale and attitude questionnaire. In detail, the science-concept test could measure students' understanding of science-content; the process-skill scale could measure students' skill performance; the attitude questionnaire could survey students' perception for using the modules. Applying these modules into real class practice and evaluating students' learning performance, the researcher could have further introspection for designing modules.
The result found that students had obvious progress in the knowledge after the module teaching. The best performance of process skill was still text reading which were fostered from traditional education. However, the students’ abilities which STS would like to cultivate were not as good as expectation. Besides, the similar activities should be executed for a long term and then they could make students have better progress in the skill performance.
The result of the attitude questionnaire showed that students had positive views toward modules. Nevertheless, this research was influenced by summer vocation. As a result, more students choose “no comment” in multiple choices. Their attitude can not be compared with their authentic attitude in real science class. Moreover, the researcher suggested that module designing not only included hands-on activities students interested in but also increased the motivation promoting students to do problem-solving. Only when the developed modules could be combined with curriculums and be applied into real classes, they could demonstrate the real utility of modules.

並列關鍵字

STS ； teaching module

參考文獻

王澄霞（1996）：化學領域之STS 師資培育課程架構。化學，54（2），103-114。

江清俊、洪志明（2003）：九年一貫之教學模組開發與設計「烈焰中誕生卻如冰晶美麗-玻璃」。科學教育月刊，260，61~72。

沈家平（2003）：STS模式教學對學生批判思考能力之影響。台北市：國立台灣師範大學物理所碩士論文。

吳璧純、甘漢銧（2000）：一個小學STS 教學模組設計-----農藥知多少。STS科學教育研討會（Ⅲ）論文彙編。國立台灣師範大學編印。

周岱學（2003）：STS融入教學對國中生創造力與問題解決能力之影響。台北市：國立台灣師範大學化學所碩士論文。