保爾˙呂格爾(Paul Ricoeur)的自我詮釋學之教育蘊義

The educational implications of Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutics of Self

楊博智(Bo-chih Yang)

指導教授 ： 楊深坑 ； 林逢祺

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育學系/碩士(2000年)

摘要

本研究旨在探討Ricoeur之自我詮釋學之教育蘊義。為深入了解Ricoeur自我詮釋學立論的基礎，本文先就Ricoeur的生平、著述及學術背景；其次，以對人類行動的解釋及自我的倫理道德的兩個論點來分析Ricoeur的自我詮釋學；最後根據分析的結果，探討Ricoeur自我詮釋學在教育上之蘊義。
根據以上探討，本研究之結論如下：
一、 Ricoeur的哲學論點所關懷的，一直都集中在自我這個面向。
二、 Ricoeur認為對人類活動的理解，應從對行動者本身來探討為起點。
三、 Ricoeur認為，人的道德行為必須經由對Kant的形式主義道德觀及Aristotle的目的論道德觀的詮釋
四、 從Ricoeur對自我的分析當中，可以得知教育活動的分析應兼及肉體、他人、良心與教育間的關係。
五、 從Ricoeur對人的道德面向的探討中可以得知，道德教育的實施應兼及情性的層面。
根據以上的結論，本研究提出以下建議：
一、 對教育活動的研究應以教育活動者本身為中心。
二、 教育相關領域的研究應更注意人類活動當中非理性層面的研究。
三、 道德教育應更注重道德實踐能力的培養。
四、 敘事文的反省有助於道德教育的實施。

關鍵字

保爾˙呂格爾(Paul Ricoeur)(1913- ) ； 自我 ； 詮釋學 ； 教育哲學 ； 行動 ； 道德

並列摘要

The purpose of this essay is on the educational implications of Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics of Self. For understand deeply the foundations of Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics of Self, this essay first concerns the life, works and academic background of Ricoeur. Secondly, this essay analyzes Ricoeur’s Hermeneutic of Self by his interpretation of human actions and ethic and moral dimensions of human self. Lastly, this essay finds the educational implication of Ricoeur’s Hermeneutics of Self by the consequence of analysis above.
According to the analysis above, the conclusions of this essay is:
1. What Ricoeur’s philosophical concerns is focus on the dimension of human self.
2. It is Ricoeur’s view that the interpretations of human actions must be on agent himself.
3. On Ricoeur point, human moral actions must realize by Kant’s moral views of formalism and Aristotle’s moral views of teleology.
4. From Ricoeur’s analysis of human self, we can understand the analysis of educational actions must on the relations of education between flesh, other and conscience.
5. From Ricoeur’s analysis of human moral actions, we can understand the practice of moral education must be inclusive of human emotion.
According the conclusions above, this essay gives the suggestions below:
1. The research of educational action must be on agent of educational action.
2. Educational research must be focus on emotional dimensions of human actions
3. Moral education must emphasize on development of moral practice.
4. The reflections to narration benefit for practices of moral education.

並列關鍵字

Paul Ricoeur(1913-) ； self ； Hermeneutics ； Philosophy of education ； action ； morality

參考文獻

Ricoeur, P.（1974）. The Conflict of Interpretation. Essays in Hermeneutics I, trans.& ed. by Don Ihde. Evaston: Northwestern University Press.

Aristotle（1984）. The Nicomachean Ethics, trans. by W. D. Ross, revised by J. O. Urmson, Princeyon. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Charles E. Reagon（1996）. Paul Ricoeur: his life and his work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Clark S. H. （1990）. Paul Ricoeur. London and New York: Routelegde.

Erben, M.（2000）. “Ethics, Education, Narrative Communication and Biography”. Education Studies, Sep2000, Vol.26 Issue 3, pp.379- 391.