透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.142.171.180
  • 學位論文

室內拔河運動生理反應之研究

Physiological Responses to Simulated Indoor Tug-of-War

指導教授 : 林正常
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


室內拔河運動生理反應之研究 民國九十年六月 研 究 生:謝和龍 指導教授:林正常 中文摘要 本研究目的在探討:一、室內拔河運動(Indoor Tug of War)心肺反應之情形。二、比較進攻動作(back step)與防守動作(power hold)心跳率、攝氧量、運動強度自覺量表、血壓以及血乳酸之差異。三、拔河運動恢復期血乳酸之變化情形。以國內10位優秀男子拔河選手為受試對象,平均年齡23.09±2.43歲,平均身高174.20±3.12公分,平均體重74.72±4.94公斤,平均拔河年數3.45±1.46年。本研究採重複量數之設計,每位受試者隨機接受一次跑步機最大攝氧量測驗與兩次1分鐘不同的拔河動作測驗。拔河測驗過程進行採氣及心跳率測量;拔河運動後,立即測量血壓以及詢問運動強度自覺量表;運動前1分鐘及比賽後第1、3、5、7、10分鐘進行指尖採血,分析血乳酸。統計方法:一、t-test考驗不同拔河動作之心跳率、攝氧量、運動強度自覺量表、血壓。二、0ne-way ANCOVA考驗不同拔河動作之血乳酸最大值。三、0ne-way ANOVA考驗各時間血乳酸之差異,若達顯著差異則以杜凱法(Tukey)進行事後比較。所有統計顯著水準定為α =.05。本研究所獲得結果:一、受試者之最大攝氧量為58.80±11.78 ml/kg/min,最大心跳率為193±5.4 beats/min。二、拔河進攻動作與防守動作分別達最大攝氧量45.4%、31.4%;達最大心跳率75.6±%、67.6%。三、拔河進攻動作的攝氧量、心跳率、運動強度自覺量表、血乳酸和心縮壓比防守動作高(25.67±4.67 vs. 17.96±4.31 ml/kg/min;143±14.9 vs. 131±11.5 beats/min;5.8±0.98 vs. 4.2±0.98;5.3±0.95 vs. 4.0±0.81 mmol/L ;145±13.4 vs. 131±12.3 mmHg),達顯著差異;心舒壓則否。四、血乳酸峰值出現在運動後第3分鐘,且此時間與第1、5、7分鐘未達顯著差異。 關鍵詞:室內拔河、進攻動作、防守動作、生理反應

並列摘要


Physiological Responses to Simulated Indoor Tug-of-War June, 2001 Student: Ho-Lung Hsieh Advisor: Jung-Charng Lin Abstract The purpose of this study was to compare the responses of oxygen consumption (VO2), heart rate (HR), 10-point ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), blood lactate (BLa) between offensive(back step)and defensive (power hold)technique during simulated Indoor Tug-of-War (TOW). Ten elite male TOW athletes (age=23.09±2.43 years, height=174.20±3.12 cm, weight=74.72±4.94 kg, sports age=3.45±1.46 years) performed one VO2max test with Bruce protocol on a treadmill and completed a single 1-minute bout of offensive technique, and defensive technique respectively in a counter-balanced order. VO2 and HR were measured during each TOW trial while BP and RPE were immediately collected at the end exercise. BLa samples were obtained from fingertips pre-exercise and at 1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th and 10th minute post-exercise. The data were analyzed by pair t-test, one-way ANCOVA, one-way ANOVA, and the statistical significance was set at a=0.05 level. The results indicated:(1)The subjects' average VO2max was 58.80±11.78 ml/kg/min, and HRmax was 193±5.4 beats/min;(2)Back step reached 45.4% VO2max, 75.6% HRmax, while power hold at 31.4% VO2max, 67.6% HRmax;(3) The offensive VO2, HR, and RPE, BLa, systolic BP responses were significantly higher than those of defensive technique(25.67±4.67 vs. 17.96±4.31 ml/kg/min;143±14.9 vs. 131±11.5 beats/min;5.8±0.98 vs. 4.2±0.98;5.3±0.95 vs. 4.0±0.81 mmol/L ;145±13.4 vs. 131±12.3 mmHg). No significant difference was found in diastolic BP responses;(4)Peak BLa were found in 3rd minute post-exercise in both techniques. Keywords:Indoor Tug-of-War, back step, power hold, physiological responses.

參考文獻


ARRAY(0xedc8900)

被引用紀錄


涂瑞洪(2001)。八人制室內拔河最佳隊形之研究〔博士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2603200719121027
李尹鑫(2011)。拔河機的開發與評估〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-1610201315225796

延伸閱讀