本研究之主要目的在於以環境價值教學法設計一套關於資源回收的自編教材,探討環境價值教學法與傳統教學法之教學效果比較分析,希望能提供一套以環境價值教學為導向的資源回收環境教育教學模式,以做為未來九年一貫課程實施推動學校資源回收教育的參考。本研究共分為兩組:即實驗組及對照組。實驗組國一學生接受環境價值教學法介入,對照組國一學生則接受傳統教學法介入。進行教學介入前一週實施前測,教學介入後一週實施後測。本研究結果歸納如下:一、 研究對象資源回收的知識來源以「學校師長」的比率最高佔92.9%,其次為「電視」、「父母」。二、 兩組後測有╱無意圖者之各信念差異比較:實驗組學生在「態度」、「自我效能」及「資源回收知識」上有整體性之顯著差異;對照組在「態度」、「主觀規範」、「自我效能」及「資源回收知識」達到整體性之顯著差異。三、 不論是傳統教學法或是環境價值教學法,各組在「行為意圖」及「資源回收知識」上,後測分數均較前測分數為高,表示此兩種教學方法都有其教學效果。四、 所有研究對象資源回收行為意圖的影響情形方面,「態度」及「主觀規範」與行為意圖間均成正相關。五、 以學生參與度、課堂氣氛、學生反應方面,環境價值教學法較傳統教學法為佳;但在時間掌控上,又以傳統教學法來得好。 The main purpose of this study was to apply environmental values approach to make the teaching models of resources recycling education, and to explore the differences of the teaching effects between environmental values approach and traditional approach. There were two groups: experimental group with environmental values approach, controlled group with traditional approach. In order to explore the different teaching effects, the study gave the students two tests before and after teaching intervention in a week. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1. Over ninety percent of the students’ knowledge was from teachers,and then television and family. 2. Between recycling intenders and non-intenders of all the students, there were significant differences in attitude, self-efficacy and resources recycling knowledge in the experimental group; there were significant differences in attitude, self-efficacy, subjective norm and resources recycling knowledge in the controlled group. 3. There were the positively effects in behavior intention and resources recycling knowledge between environmental values approach and traditional approach. 4. The attitude and subjective norm of all the students were significantly positively related to the behavior intention. 5. The teaching model of environmental values approach was favorable for students, and made better effects on the atmosphere of classes.
The main purpose of this study was to apply environmental values approach to make the teaching models of resources recycling education, and to explore the differences of the teaching effects between environmental values approach and traditional approach. There were two groups: experimental group with environmental values approach, controlled group with traditional approach. In order to explore the different teaching effects, the study gave the students two tests before and after teaching intervention in a week. The main findings of this study were as follows: 1. Over ninety percent of the students’ knowledge was from teachers,and then television and family. 2. Between recycling intenders and non-intenders of all the students, there were significant differences in attitude, self-efficacy and resources recycling knowledge in the experimental group; there were significant differences in attitude, self-efficacy, subjective norm and resources recycling knowledge in the controlled group. 3. There were the positively effects in behavior intention and resources recycling knowledge between environmental values approach and traditional approach. 4. The attitude and subjective norm of all the students were significantly positively related to the behavior intention. 5. The teaching model of environmental values approach was favorable for students, and made better effects on the atmosphere of classes.