透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.157.186
  • 學位論文

線上同儕評量對國中生簡報製作技能學習成效之研究

The Effect of On-line Peer Assessment on Learning PowerPoint

指導教授 : 陳明溥
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究旨在探討線上同儕評量及績效回饋、改正回饋對國中學生簡報製作技能學習成效的影響。研究樣本為國民中學二年級兩班62位學生。在教學實驗中,依評量方式及回饋方式,分為同儕評量-績效回饋組、同儕評量-改正回饋組、教師評量-績效回饋組及教師評量-改正回饋組等四組。研究結果發現(1)評量方式對國中學生簡報製作技能學習成效沒有顯著影響;(2)評量方式與回饋方式之交互作用對國中學生簡報製作技能學習成效沒有顯著影響;(3)回饋方式對國中學生簡報製作技能學習成效有顯著影響-改正回饋優於績效回饋;(4)大多數的學生可以接受同儕評量;(5)大多數的學生認為同儕評量是公平的,但有部份人但仍懷疑同儕評量的公平性及同儕評量可以評得和老師評量一樣好;(6)同儕評量在評分上範圍比較小。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of on-line peer assessment and feedback (performance feedback vs. corrected feedback) on junior high students’ PowerPoint learning performance and attitudes. The samples of this study are 62 studennts in two classes. The subject were assigned to one of the four experiment groups: peer assessment - performance feedback group, peer assessment - corrected feedback group, staff assessment - performance feedback group, staff assessment - corrected feedback group.The result show that: (1)there was no significantly difference between the peer assessment and staff assessment on learning PowerPoint is not signal, (2) there was no significantly difference among the corelation between various assessment and various feedback on learning PowerPoint , (3) there was significantly difference between the corrected feedback and performance feedback, the corrected feedback group was significantly better than performance feedback group, (4)the method of peer assessment is acceptable by students, (5)peer can assess fairly, but someone doubts the fariness (6)the students gave a narrower range of marks than the teacher.

參考文獻


徐雍智、蔡今中、陳明璋(2002)。數學創意類比與同儕評量及其網路案例設計之初探。師大學報:科學教育類,47(1),1-14。
班杜拉(Albert Bandura)著、周曉虹譯(1995)。社會學習論(Social Learning Theory by Albert Bandura)。台北:桂冠。
徐椿樑(2001)。鷹架學習理論在專業技術教學的成效分析之研究。國立臺灣師範大學工業教育研究所博士論文。
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (1989). Quantitative studies of student self-assessment in higher education: A critical analysis of findings. Higher Education, 18, 529-549.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Sluijsmans, D., (1999). The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in Higher education: A view. Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 331-350.

被引用紀錄


李晧銘(2016)。使用線上同儕互評機制探討學生學習成就與同儕互評觀點之關係研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2016.00286
李俊毅(2010)。同儕教練對國中科學教師PCK發展之行動研究〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu201000332
姚佩吟(2011)。Web2.0下的腦力激盪─探討不同社群型態與回饋類型對個人創造力表現之影響〔碩士論文,元智大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6838/YZU.2011.00045
高慧君(2003)。網路同儕互評於教學實習之成效分析〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2603200719135482
陳月珍(2004)。資優同儕鷹架支持與電腦輔助教學對提昇身障學生數學學習成效與互動品質之研究〔碩士論文,國立臺灣師範大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0021-2004200713212915

延伸閱讀