第三十五屆國際化學奧林匹亞不同管道選訓營學員創造力與代表隊選手解理論試題的分析比較研究

Research about The 35th IChO

康素瑜(Kang Su-Yu)

指導教授 ： 方泰山

國立臺灣師範大學/理學院/化學系/碩士(2003年)

摘要

無資料

關鍵字

國際化學奧林匹亞 ； 化學解題 ； 概念 ； 創造力

並列摘要

This research is about the 35th IChO competition. There are three purposes, first, to investigate the significant difference of three different channels and two different background of 35th IChO Taiwan’s study and selection camp .Secondly, we analyze the relative percentage of 35th IchO in four fields and theoretical tasks syllabus as well as the results of four competitors. Finally, the problem-solving activities of four competitors are explored based on declarative knowledge, chemical concepts and procedural knowledge . We conclude as below:
I. Willian’s Creativity Assessment Packet was used to study the significant difference of three different channels of 35th IChO Taiwan’s study and selection camp. It revealed that (1) The originality and chemistry achievement of student candidates from gifted classes are notable better than those from normal classes. (2)The chemistry achievement of the student candidates enrolled by Taiwan senior high school chemistry competition winners is notably better than the other groups. (3). The fluency of the group enrolled by primary selection two-hours written test is notable better than that of the group from Taiwan senior high school chemistry competition winners.
II. Secondly, the results are as follows (1).The characteristic of 35th IChO theoretical tasks is to contain the separate general chemistry test questions. Besides, the field of the most weighted percentage is physical chemistry, 34.4%. The four competitors all got high scores in general chemistry field and the average is 96.7%. Obviously, this section is not the key point to winning or losing in this competition. Three of these tasks about quantum chemistry、refrigerant and NMR spectrum are well done by the four .They gain full marks. The lowest score four competitors gained is the two tasks concerning momentum、peptide synthesis ,which could be interpreted that they are not familiar with the concepts of this field.
III. Finally, it can be concluded as: (1) The achievement of solving problem of the four competitors is related to whether they master the concepts or not .The results they gained have nothing to do with the types of relevant chemical concepts. Besides, the result of only one competitor is related to concept density and the other three are not. (2) This research concludes 27 types of procedural knowledge in chemistry problem-solving. (3) The major procedural knowledge of the failure in problem solving is “to define concepts”, which suggests chemical concepts is everything.

並列關鍵字

International Chemistry Olympiad ； Chemistry problem solving

參考文獻

王春展(民86) 專家與生手間問題解決能力的差異及其在教學上的啟示。教育研究資訊，5(2)，80-92頁。

林重新(民90) 心理與教育測驗，揚智文化事業股份有限公司。

競賽試題(中文版)，國立台灣師範大學化學系，化學研究所主編。

陳玉玲(民92) 國際化學奧林匹亞競賽力屆實作試題的三大層級的界定義與詮釋之研究，國立台灣師範大學化學研究所碩士論文。

廖焜熙(民88) 有機立體化學成就影響因素及解題模式的研究，國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士輪文。