高雄縣國中校園零體罰與正向管教政策實施成效之研究

The Research on implementation effects of zero physical punishment in the campus and the promulgation of positive disciplinary education policy in junior high schools of Kaohsiung County

謝明昌(Hsieh Ming Cheng)

指導教授 ： 吳清基

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/教育學系/碩士(2007年)

摘要

本研究主題，為國內校園零體罰立法與正向管教政策頒佈後，其實施成效與及其實施後有關問題之研究。本研究之研究範圍為高雄縣國中，研究對象為高雄縣國中教師。
本研究主要研究取徑為量化研究，經由文獻探討收集關於體罰與正向管教各項學理依據，如校園零體罰的發展脈絡、體罰的相關研究、正向心理學專論、學術論文、相關期刊、教育法規、報章雜誌、以及社會輿論等作為理論背景，發展出本研究主要研究工具問卷，進行樣本施測與結果分析，形成研究結論與建議。根據上述研究方法，本研究結果如下：
一、多數高雄縣國中教師並不贊同校園零體罰政策，認為適度體罰在管教上仍有價值。
二、多數高雄縣教師認為，體罰應該要明確定義，方能有效推行零體罰。
三、校園零體罰政策，需要政策的配套，方能使教師管教學生維持成效。
四、多數高雄縣國中教師認同正向管教，政策實施成效亦佳。
五、增進教師管教知、以及對正向管教政策的認同，能使校園零體罰落實。
六、高雄縣國中推動校園零體罰成效佳，多數教師表示不使用體罰管教並加以避免。
七、減少班級人數、並制訂家長參與學生管教機制，為校園零體罰政策的當務之急。
八、從學生品德教育、生活教育著手，塑造友善校園氣氛，能使正向管教政策收效。

關鍵字：校園零體罰、正向管教

關鍵字

校園零體罰 ； 正向管教

並列摘要

Abstract

This paper is a study with the themes on the implementation effects after the legislation of zero physical punishment in the campus and the promulgation of positive disciplinary education policy in Taiwan, and on the related problems created after implementation. The research area of this study covers the junior high schools of Kaohsiung County, and the research targets are the junior high school teachers of Kaohsiung County.

The research approach of the study is quantitative research. Through literature review, the paper collects the various theoretical references about physical punishment and positive disciplinary education, such as the development pulses of physical punishment in the campus, the related researches about physical punishment, the topical discussions on positive psychology, the academic research papers, the related periodicals, the acts and regulations of education, the newspapers and magazines, and the public opinion of the society, all of which are taken as the theoretical background of human behaviors. After that, the paper develops the major research tool of this study, a questionnaire, to carry out the tests of the samples and analyze the results, forming the conclusions and suggestions for this study. According to the abovementioned research methods, the research results are shown as follows:
1. A majority of the teachers of the junior high schools of Kaohsiung County do not agree to the zero physical punishment policy in the campus. They think that appropriate physical punishment is still valuable to disciplinary education.
2. A majority of the teachers of Kaohsiung County think that physical punishment should be clearly defined before the effective implementation of zero physical punishment.
3. The zero physical punishment policy in the campus needs the aid of the associated measures if the teachers intend to keep achieving the old effects of disciplinary education for students.
4. A majority of the teachers of the junior high schools of Kaohsiung County agree to positive disciplinary education, and the implementation effects of this policy is also very good.
5. The increase of the knowledge and ability of the teachers’ disciplinary education as well as their higher agreement to positive disciplinary education policy can better practically implement the zero physical punishment policy.
6. The junior high schools of Kaohsiung County achieve good performance in the promotion of zero physical punishment in the campus. A majority of the teachers expressed that they had decreased physical punishment, and tried to avoid exercising physical punishment.
7. The imminent measures of the zero physical punishment policy in the campus are the decrease of the number of students of each class, and the formulation of a disciplinary education mechanism of students available for the participation of parents.
8. Starting from the moral education and living education of students, a friendly campus atmosphere can be modeled, achieving the effects of positive disciplinary education policy.

Key Words：zero physical punishment in the campus,positive disciplinary education

並列關鍵字

zero physical punishment in the campus ； positive disciplinary education

參考文獻

史英（1989）。我們為什麼籌組人本教育基金會。人本教育札記，試刊號。

司法院大法官會議釋字第三八二號解釋文(1997)。監察院公報，2091，235-236。

林佳範（2006c）。全國律師六月號。台北市：中華民國律師公會聯合會。

林玉體（1984）。教育概論。台北市：文景。

林志成（2004）。從系統化的教育剖析體罰問題。國立新竹師範學院「國教世紀」，211，81-88。