「家庭支持」與「物質主義」對「家庭對工作衝突與增益感受」之影響

The Impact of Family Support and Materialism on Family toward Work Conflict and Enrichment

高暐翔(Kao Wei-Hsiang)

指導教授 ： 周麗端

國立臺灣師範大學/教育學院/人類發展與家庭學系/碩士(2019年)

https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU201901069

摘要

本研究旨在瞭解「家庭支持」與「物質主義」對「家庭對工作衝突與增益感受」的影響。為探究家庭對工作感受的影響，研究對象的選擇為，對家庭與工作兩個介面的相互影響感受會較深刻的已婚且有子女之全職工作者。其中，家庭支持的內涵包含訊息性、情緒性與實質性；物質主義的內涵包含迎合世俗、占有愉悅、金錢至上、物質滿意；家庭對工作衝突感受的內涵包含時間、壓力、行為；家庭對工作增益感受的內涵包含發展、情感、效能。
研究採問卷調查法，研究工具包含「背景資料」、「家庭支持量表」、「物質主義量表」、「家庭對工作衝突感受量表」及「家庭對工作增益感受量表」。以立意抽樣及滾雪球的方式發放電子問卷，共回收504份有效問卷作分析。研究將性別、年齡、最小子女年齡及同住情況作為控制變項，其研究發現如下：
1. 情緒性支持與實質性支持愈多，會降低家庭對工作時間、壓力及行為衝突感受，並增加家庭對工作發展、情感及效能增益感受。
2. 物質主義傾向愈高，會增加家庭對工作時間、壓力及行為感受。當與家庭支持共同分析時，迎合世俗傾向愈高，會增加態度傾向會增加家庭對工作時間、壓力及行為衝突感受
3. 占有愉悅傾向愈高，會增加家庭對工作情感及效能增益感受；物質滿意則反之；金錢至上傾向愈高會減少家庭對工作發展及情感增益感受；迎合世俗傾向愈高，會增加家庭對工作情感增益感受。當與家庭支持共同分析時，物質滿意會降低家庭對工作情感增益感受。
根據研究結果，建議多給予家人家庭支持，以及適當調整自我價值觀與態度，以達到較少的「家庭對工作衝突感受」，及增加「家庭對工作增益感受」。

關鍵字

家庭支持 ； 物質主義 ； 家庭對工作衝突感受 ； 家庭對工作增益感受

並列摘要

The purpose of this study was to understand the impact of family support and materialism on family toward work conflict and enrichment. A questionnaire, purposive, and snowball sampling were used to obtain responses from 504 participants who are having full-time jobs, married and have at least a child. The dimension of family support, including informational support, emotional support and practical support. The dimension of materialism, including money first, material satisfaction, possession pleasure and conformity. The dimension of family-to-work conflict, including time, strain and behavior. The dimension of family-to-work enrichment, including developmental, affect and efficiency.
Regression analysis revealed that family-to-work conflict and family-to-work enrichment affected by family support and materialism when the control variables including gender, age, the age of the youngest child and the structure of family members of living together. The study concluded: (a) Family-to-work conflict was lower when participants got more family support. (b) Family-to-work enrichment was higher when participants got more family support. (c) Family-to-work conflict was higher when participants were highly materialistic. (d) Family-to-work enrichment was lower when participants were highly value of money first and material satisfaction. (e) Family-to-work enrichment was higher when participants were highly valued of conformity and possession pleasure. (f) The dimension of development and efficiency in family-to-work enrichment were not able to be explained by materialism when materialism and family support input regression together. The study finding may serve as a guide for further research on the effects of family support and materialism on the work-family interface.

並列關鍵字

family support ； materialism ； family-to-work conflict ； family-to-work enrichment

參考文獻

張婷婷、陸洛、潘君鳳（2012）。工作與家庭的雙向增益：前因、後果及互依我的調節作用。中華心理學刊，54（4），471-493。

陸洛、張婷婷、張妤玥（2012）。工作與家庭的意義對因應職家衝突的影響─華人雙文化自我觀之展現。本土心理學研究，37，141-189。

黃寶園、林世華（2007）。人格特質與社會支持對壓力反應歷程影響之研究：結合統合分析與結構方程模式二計量方法。教育心理學報，39（2），263-294。

陸洛、黃茂丁、高旭繁（2005）。工作與家庭的雙向衝突：前因、後果及調節變項之探討。應用心理研究，27，133-166。

Schudson, M. (1984). Advertising, the uneasy persuasion: Its dubious impact on American society. New York: Basic Books.