透過您的圖書館登入
IP:216.73.216.237
  • 學位論文

威權領導、員工建言行為與主管建言評價關聯之研究-以傳統性為調節效果

The Relationship between Authoritarian Leadership, Employee Voice Behavior, and Managers’ Evaluation of Voice: The Moderating Effect of Traditionality

指導教授 : 陳怡靜
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究目的為探討威權領導、員工建言行為與主管建言評價之間的關聯性,以員工及主管的傳統性作為調節效果。採用問卷調查的方式,以便利抽樣形式,針對各產業之企業全職之員工及主管為研究對象,並採配對的方式發放問卷,由一位員工對一位主管,有效問卷共 126 對,有效回收率為 93.33%。研究結果顯示:(1) 威權領導與促進 性建言、抑制性建言具有負向影響;(2) 促進性建言、抑制性建言與主管建言評價具有正向影響,抑制性建言與研究預期假設相反;(3) 員工的傳統性在威權領導與促進性建言和抑制性建言之間具有強化之調節效果。最後,根據分析之結果進行討論,並提出管理上的實務意涵與未來的研究建議。

並列摘要


The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationship between authoritarian leadership, employee voice behavior, and managers’ evaluation of voice, as well as the moderating effects of traditionality. By questionnaire survey, the data were collected from full-time employees and supervisors as paired from different organization and industry, and one employee matches one supervisor. The study collected 126 paired of valid questionnaires, and there is a 93.33% return rate. The results of the study show that: (1) There’s a negative influence between authoritarian leadership and promotive voice, prohibitive voice. (2) There’s a positive influence between promotive voice, prohibitive voice and managers’ evaluation of voice, and prohibitive voice is opposite of what is originally study expected. (3) Employee’s traditionality has a moderating effect in the relationship between authoritarian leadership and promotive voice, prohibitive voice. Finally, based on the results of the analysis, management implications and future research directions are discussed.

參考文獻


吳宗祐、周麗芳、鄭伯壎(2008)。主管的權威取向及其對部屬順從與畏懼的知覺對威權領導的預測效果。本土心理學研究,30,65-115。
周婉茹、周麗芳、鄭伯壎、任金剛(2010)。專權與尚嚴之辨:再探威權領導的內涵與恩威並濟的效果。本土心理學研究,34,223-284。
楊國樞(2004)。華人自我的理論分析與實徵研究:社會取向與個人取向的觀點。本土心理學研究,22,11-80。
鄭伯壎、周麗芳、樊景立(2000)。家長式領導:三元模式的建構與測量。本土心理學研究,14,3-64。
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.

延伸閱讀