工程導向實作訓練對於提升高中生科技素養的影響

The impact of engineering-oriented hands-on training on enhancing technology literacy of high school students

黃政嘉(Huang Chen-Chia)

指導教授 ： 丁玉良

國立臺灣師範大學/科技與工程學院/科技應用與人力資源發展學系/碩士(2022年)

https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202200277

摘要

本研究依據十二年國民基本教育科技領域課程綱要，以科技素養為研究主題，針對北部某高中121名學生，分為實驗組與控制組，實驗組採用工程導向實作課程，控制組則採用傳统科技實作課程，進行準實驗研究。探討工程導向實作課程對高中生科技素養之影響。
本研究結果得到以下結論：(1)高中生的科技資訊來源主要是學校課程。(2)高中生一般的科技素養表现為中等偏上，但設計和創新思维能力普遍较弱。(3)工程導向實作課程的實驗组(EOPT组)在各方面的科技素養比傳统科技實作課程的對照组(TTPC组)提高幅度大。(4)EOPT组學生的技術素養表現明顯提升，其中技術能力提高幅度最大。TTPC组學生則在製作和使用工具的能力有穩定表現。(5)兩组學生在技術態度上没有明顯改善。

關鍵字

實作訓練 ； 工程教育 ； 工程設計 ； 科技素養測驗 ； 科技素養

並列摘要

The quasi-experimental study aimed to investigate the technological literacy on the base of the Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education in Technology field. 121 students of a northern high school were divided into an experimental group and a control group. The experimental group used the engineering-oriented hands-on curriculum while the control group used the traditional technology hands-on curriculum. The impact of the engineering-oriented hands-on curriculum on the technological literacy of high school students was explored.
Technological Literacy Test and the SPSS statistical software were used to analyze the differences in technology attitudes, technology knowledge, technology skills, and technology abilities between two groups. The impact of the engineering-oriented hands-on curriculum on the technological literacy of high school students was examined.
The experimental results indicate that (1) The technology information of high school students was mainly from the school curriculum. (2) The technological literacy of high school students was moderately high, but the design and innovative thinking skills were generally weak. (3) The engineering-oriented experimental group (EOPT) showed a greater improvement in all aspects of technological literacy than the traditional technology hands-on control group (TTPC). (4) Students in the EOPT group showed significant improvement in technical literacy, with the greatest improvement in technical skills, while students in the TTPC group showed stable performance in the ability to make and use tools (5) Students in both groups showed no significant improvement in technical attitudes.

並列關鍵字

hands-on training ； engineering education ； engineering design ； technology literacy ； technology literacy test

參考文獻

一、中文部分

朱耀明(2011)。「動手做」的學習意涵分析—杜威的經驗學習觀點。生活科技教育月刊，44(2)，32-43。

余鑑(2003）。工藝教育思想的流變。生活科技教育月刊，36(8)，3-11。

李賢哲(2001)。以動手做(DIY）工藝的興趣培養中小學童具科學創造力之人格特質。科學教育，243，2-7。

汪殿杰、巫鍵志、王意蘭、吳致娟（2014）。強調動手實作的科技教育-以臺北市立大同高中為例。中等教育，65，141-151。