探討科學探究與實作課程中建模教學對高中學生論證表現的影響

Investigating the Influences of Modeling-based Instruction on Students' Argumentation in Science Inquiry and Practice Course

謝東霖(Hsieh Tung-Lin)

指導教授 ： 邱美虹

國立臺灣師範大學/理學院/科學教育研究所/碩士(2022年)

https://doi.org/10.6345/NTNU202201773

摘要

「論證與建模」是臺灣在民國108年正式實施的十二年國民基本教育(簡稱108課綱)中，探究與實作課程裡所提到的探究學習內容。本研究擬透過實徵研究達到以下三個研究目的： (1) 探討不同教學活動下學生的論證表現；(2) 探討不同教學活動下學生模型功能與建模歷程表現；(3) 探討教師和學生在課堂中對話上論證使用的情形。本研究利用蠟燭燃燒實驗，透過建模歷程引導，讓學生在不同現象中修正呈現模型，最終透過課堂任務將模型應用在TAP論證任務中，訓練學生「論證與建模」能力。本研究結果顯示：(1)在論證表現上，兩組學生後測表現均優於前測，但兩組學生在後測表現上未達顯著差異。在論證表現的四個向度中，實驗組在「論據種類分辨」表現優於對照組；兩組學生在TAP任務上測驗分數未達顯著差異，但TAP任務的四個向度上，在「支持」向度實驗組表現優於對照組。(2)在模型功能與建模歷程表現上，兩組學生在前後測表現與兩組後測表現上未均達顯著差異。不過在模型功能與建模歷程的四個向度中，在「建模歷程」向度上實驗組表現優於對照組。(3)從課堂對話分析中可發現，在建模教學的課堂中確實能在不同階段展現學生「處理數據、爭論」等技巧，若想訓練學生反對、產生替代理論與反駁的技巧，有賴教師在課程設計上的加入論點的討論，以及增加師生對話的提問。研究結果可以提供高中進行探究與實作課程時具體的參考方向。

關鍵字

論證 ； 建模 ； 建模教學

並列摘要

" Argumentation and modeling" is the inquiry learning content mentioned in the 12-year Basic Education Curricula Guidelines in Taiwan in 2019 . The purpose of this research is as follows: (1) Investigating the performance of students' argumentation in different instruction, (2) Investigating students’ performance on understanding of model function and modeling process in different instruction, and (3) Investigating the situation of teachers and students' use of argumentation in classroom dialogues. This study uses a candle burning experiment, embedded with the modeling process, to allow students to revise their model in different phenomena, and finally apply the model to the TAP Argumentation tasks. The results of this study show: (1) In the performance of argumentation , the post-test performance of the two groups of students was better than the pre-test, but there was no significant difference in the post-test performance. However, in the four items of argumentation performance, the experimental group performed better than the control group in the item of "distinguishing the types of arguments"; In the TAP task, there was no significant difference in test scores between the two groups of students, but in the four items of the TAP task, the experimental group performed better than the control group in the "support" item. (2) In the understanding of the functions of models and modeling process test, there was no significant difference between the two groups of students in the pre- and post-test performance and the two groups' post-test performance. However, the experimental group performed better than the control group in the "modeling process" item.
(3) It can be found from the analysis of classroom dialogues that students can indeed demonstrate skills such as " dealing with evidence and arguing" at different stages in the classroom of modeling teaching. Teachers have responsibility to cultivate students to develop for and against arguments, produce alternative theories and refutations. In the course design, the discussion of the arguments can be included in school practice to increase the dialogue between teachers and students.

並列關鍵字

Argumentation ； Modeling ； Modeling instruction

參考文獻

中文文獻

1. 邱美虹(2008)。模型與建模能力之理論架構。科學教育月刊，306，2-9。https://dx.doi.org/ 10.6216/SEM.200803_(306).0001

2. 邱美虹。(2016)。科學模型與建模：科學模型、科學建模與建模能力。臺灣化學教育，11。民111年6月23日，取自：http://chemed.chemistry.org.tw/?p=13898

3. 邱美虹、曾茂仁（2018）。科學建模本位的探究教學之教材設計—以化學電池為例。臺灣化學教育，28。民111年6月23日，取自：http://chemed.chemistry.org.tw/?p=31481

4. 邱美虹、劉俊庚(2008)。從科學學習的觀點探討模型與建模能力。科學教育月刊，314，2-20。https://dx.doi.org/10.6216/SEM.200811_(314).0001