- 學位論文
社區治理與公民會館－以臺北市文山及中正公民會館為例
COMMUNITY GOVERNANCE AND CITIZENSHIP ENHANCEMENT：THE COMPARATIVE CASE STUDY OF WENSHAN AND ZHONGZHENG PUBLIC ASSEMBLY HALL，TAIPEI CITY
摘要
有鑑於第一部門：公部門及第二部門：市場的功能不彰，產生失靈現象，於是出現了結合政府與市場優點的「第三部門」（通稱非營利組織），期待能解決第一與第二部門的雙重失靈危機，然獨靠第三部門也無法解決全部問題，是故由三者共同參與合作之決策管理機制成為希望之所寄。 以地方事務而言，因其範圍較小且以在地居民為主體，社區治理較其他層次治理普遍認為可行性較高，以公部門而言，與其在之後政策執行過程受阻不如事先賦權讓里鄰社區、各部門、組織及居民共同參與決策，資源互利，發揮綜效。 本研究以臺北市文山及中正公民會館為個案，藉由日本公民館經驗及社區治理相關理論、文獻，建立公民會館社區治理之分析架構，並經深度訪談及相關文獻撿戲分析，逐項檢視目前文山及中正公民會館營運情形，並對臺北市公民會館整體及文山、中正公民會館運作提出可行的政策建議。 本研究發現就社區治理而言，文山區公民會館可說已踏穩腳步，已有一定發展的進程並建立其發展雛型，不合標準的部分其大宗主導力量其實非文山區公所而是在於臺北市政府，以區公所層級而言多為法規之執行者，尚有賴上位之台北市政府能正視目前產生的問題，不論是法規面或政策面能予修正，提供區公所大力支持甚至是更為突破現狀之引導：而中正公民會館因選址不當、不合附近居民使用需求及相關規範法規不當，不僅不易更進一步朝向社區治理發展，即使其本身館務要發展的更好恐皆不易。 就公民會館整體研究建議有：加強臺北市公民會館定位、選址的改進、公民素養養成提升、加強志工來源及專業性、建立整體行銷機制、臺北市政府各單位帶頭參與、提高館長層級及管理人員編制、建立社區治理的管理及監督機制並於相關法規未修改前爭取專案試辦等。
並列摘要
In view of the first sector : the public sector(government) and the second sector: market (market) of the function is inefficient, and it failed because of the incapable management (failure); it comes out that “third sector” – combined the advantages of government and the market which is known as non-profit organizations, to expect to be able to resolve the crisis out of the first and second sectors of the dual failure. However it is hardly to get through all sophisticated situations by means of the performance of the third sector alone; the synergy of the decision-making system from the three parties is the key to the success. Based on local matters are concerned, a smaller scale as well as local residents as the main body, there is a higher feasibility to carry out the community control over others. Instead, as for the public sector, it positively prefers to grant the powers to the communities, departments, organizations and residents to work out resolutions in the decision-making process in advance rather than obstruct the road of the policy performance in the earlier form. In this study, Wenshan public assembly hall and Zhongzheng public assembly hall as a case, by the performance of the "Kominkan" in Japan in the past and community governance-related experiences, theories, literatures, the analysis of the establishment of civic Center, intense interviews and associated literature reviews, we itemize and look into the current operations of Wenshan and Zhongzheng public assembly hall and others in Taipei City , beyond that, to bring out proper strategic recommendations to them. We found in this study in terms of a community governance, Wenshan Citizens Center in the Wenshan District has been matured almost and made certain progressive developments in its successful prototype. Taipei City Government ought to take the responsibilities for those incompletion related to the governance, not the Wenshan District Office. Mostly in terms of the implementation of those laws and regulations, we need to depend on the Taipei City Government to treat them as a priority of amendments in association with either jurisdictions or policies for providing strong supports for the district office. Because of inappropriate location of Zhongzheng public assembly hall and improper restrictions on the regulations, it can not meet with the demands of local inhabitants and furthermore result more barriers in the community governance. Eventually it creates more difficulties in its development. The recommendations to the public assembly halls as follows: to strengthen the improvements of the positioning and locating of the halls of Taipei city, to enhance the civic literacy and to develop diversified resources of volunteers and their professionalism, moreover, to establish an overall marketing strategies. The Taipei City government should eagerly participate in more activities and usher to improve the management of Curators as well as the staffing, in addition, to make efficient community governance and supervision systems and to strive for pilot projects on the relevant pre-amended laws and regulations.