綠色產業(green industry)發展已成為全球因應氣候變化(climate change)與全球暖化(global warming)的最優先策略,然而,如何取得所需融資?以及如何建立綠色產業的誘因機制?易言之,如何進行綠色金融改革(green financing reform),建立有效的綠色融資機制,將攸關綠色產業發展的成敗。基於此,聯合國環境發展署(United Nations Development Program, UNDP, 2011)提出融資綠色產業的四大步驟,提供世人參考,聯合國環境規劃署(United Nations Environment Program, UNEP, 2011)倡議政府每年提撥2%GDP用於綠色投資,藉此激勵民間綠色投資的活力;英國政府為促進英國綠色產業發展,於2011年宣佈將成立「國家綠色投資銀行」(National Green Investment Bank);韓國政府於2011年制定的綠色成長基本法(Green Growth Basic Bill)亦提出發展綠色金融的政策與措施。 依據永續能源政策綱領(2008),已制定2020年綠色產業發展目標,因此,依據國際經驗,如何進行金融制度改革,促進綠色產業融資,即成為政府施政的重要課題。據此,本研究將建立兩套綠色金融發展模型,探討政府獎勵誘因機制下分別對金融機構及綠色產業補貼的影響效果,並提出我國綠色金融改革的政策建議。
Green industry development is the top priority of climate change and global warming. How to reform the green financing and to build up the green financing mechanism will be the most important issue for the green industry development. Therefore, many policies were drawn up in 2011. The United Nations Development Program (UNDP) launched a four-step methodology for the world. The United Nations Environmental Program (UNEP) initiated that 2% of world Gross Domestic Product (GDP) should be invested in the green investment. In this way, we may move towards a society of green economy. The UK Government formed the National Green Investment Bank in 2011 to encourage the development of green industry. The Korean Government also set up the Green Growth Basic Bill and launched the policy of green financing. The goal of green industry development in 2020 has been formulated at the Sustainable Energy Policy Convention. In accordance with experiences from around the world, how to formulate the optimal public policy to promote green finance will be the most important issue for decision makers. Thus, in this thesis, we are going to build two types of models, to compare the effects of government reward mechanism that subsidizes to green industries and financial institutions respectively. In conclusion, green finance reform policies will be proposed accordingly.