證券交易法第一五五條第一項第四款「連續交易」構成要件之再檢視－以我國實務見解為中心

A Review of the Judgment on “Pump and Dump Manipulation” of Article 155, Paragraph 1, Sub-paragraph 4 of the Securities and Exchange Act: Focusing on the Authentic Precedent of Taiwan, R.O.C.

何昇軒(He,Shengxuan)

指導教授 ： 鄭逸哲

國立臺北大學/法律學院/法律學系/碩士(2013年)

摘要

證券市場係現代金融體系的重要組成部分，證券市場將有形資產轉變成金融資產，也就是所謂的證劵，通過證券的買賣活動引導資金流動，促進資源配置的優化，推動經濟增長，提高經濟效率。證券市場之公平安全，除攸關證券市場投資者之財產權不受非法侵害，更係國家、甚至國際間金融穩定之重要基礎。故各國均立法禁止投資者以不法手段操縱證券市場。我國證券交易法第155條第1項即規定5種例示、1種概括規定，禁止不法操縱市場；違反者，於第171條定有刑罰之規定。第155條第1項第4款，即禁止所謂「連續交易」之規定。
連續交易，係我國實務上操縱市場最常見之行為態樣，實務及學說均對於本罪有諸多討論，惟對於本罪構成要件之解釋，有所爭議。以法院實務觀察，過往判決見解有一定之拘束力。本文嘗試整理歷來重要之判決，以實務見解為主，學說論述為輔，探討本罪之構成要件，及行為人之行為是否該當各構成要件要素之判斷標準。

關鍵字

連續交易 ； 證券詐欺 ； 操縱市場

並列摘要

In nowadays, security market is an important composition in the financial system.Security market transfers the real asset into financial asset which is called security. And Investor’s sale and purchase transactions of securities increase the capital liquidity,in order to optimize the allocationof resourcesand economic efficiency. In addition toprotect investors from violation of property,the equity and safety of security market areimportant foundationsofnationwide and global financial stability. Therefore, every country has legislated against illegal “manipulation”.
In Taiwan, Securities and Exchange Act, Article 155, Provision 1 contains 5 instances and 1 summary provision in order to prohibit illegal manipulation. Article 171 indicates the punishment for a person who has committed the offenses. Article 155, Provision 1, Sub-paragraph 4 indicates that“series transaction” is prohibited
“Pump and Dump” is the most common type of manipulation in Taiwan. There are many studies in view of practice and doctrine,but the definition of the determination of offense is usually a controversial issue between 2 sides.The observation on the practice of court shows that most of previous judgments consist some certain restrictions.
This report is going to discuss the determination of the offenses, and whether the investor’s conducts are considered as the criteria which is used to judge the offense. This report is based on the previous significant judgments, and focused on the view of practicalaspect, supported by the doctrine studies.

並列關鍵字

illegal hyping-and-dumping ； securities fraud ； manipulation

參考文獻

4. 王育慧，最高法院九十一年度台上字第三○三七號判決及臺灣高等法院八十八年度上重訴字第三九號判決之評釋（東隆五金案）--以連續交易操縱行為與內線交易為範圍，臺北大學法學論叢，第61期，2007年3月。

5. 何曜琛，證券市場操縱行為之認定與要件－簡評最高法院九六年台上字第一○四四號判決－，臺灣本土法學雜誌，第97期，2007年8月。

16. 陳文禹，操縱股價犯罪之構成要件—評最高法院九六年台上字第一○四四號判決，台灣法學雜誌，第104期，2008年3月。

2. 張佐榕，證券市場不法連續交易之研究—兼論連續交易與護盤制度之關連性，國立成功大學碩士論文，2011年7月。

10. 曾宛如，證券交易法原理，5版，2008年9月。