- 學位論文
從國際私法之觀點論網路著作財產權之侵害
The Internet Copyright Infringement on the Private International Law
摘要
網路世界的興起，改變大家的生活習慣。這其中又以網路下載對於人們的生活影響最為重大。網路世界的傳輸往往於一轉瞬間完成，其中所生的法律效果為何，有其重要性存在。所以，本文試圖從網路著作權所生之相關問題，就國際私法上的角度來加以討論。 在本文中首先先對於網路與著作權之間的關係為何加以探討，主要是針對網路法的問題作討論。有關於此部份是在國家管理、網友自我管理、或是用國際條約來加以拘束討論，並且對於其優缺點都有加以介紹與說明。 在文章的第二部份則是對於網路著作權的管轄權部份作討論。有關於管轄權，先就美國法上面的相關判決作討論。之後在從這些判決中得出原則，來探討這些原則的可行性。然後再回到我國法上面來討論我國有關於這方面管轄權的規定，是否有引進美國法理論之必要。在這個部份，主要是針對有關Zippo標準的合適性作討論，並且將正反兩說的看法加以羅列，而對於此標準在我國適用的可能性加以研究。 在第三個部份則是針對準據法的部份作討論。相同的也是從美國法的部份先討論起，討論有關美國法對於此種網路著作權侵權行為之處理方式為何，主要是討論有關於域外效力之問題，另一方面也有提到有關於實體法方法的看法。從這些看法中再回頭過來看我國現行法的困境為何，以及修正草案的規定是否可以有效的解決這樣的問題。 在最後結論的部份，主要是對於國際裁判管轄權與準據法的相關問題提出看法，並且以修正草案為基礎的前提底下，來對於本篇論文做出結論。希望在最後的地方可以總結前面的幾個章節相關問題，企圖解決有關於網路著作權侵權行為之情形。
並列摘要
When the internet arises, it changes everyone’s life. Especially the internet download affect our life the most. The internet world’s transmission often complete in a short time, and how about the effect of that has its value. So from the question about the internet copyright this article tries to discuss that in the international private law way. First, this article discusses the term between internet and copyright; mainly discuss the cyber law question. About this is nation base、browser’s self-regulation、or international treaty and then talking about their interest and defect. In the second part mainly discusses the personal jurisdiction of internet copyright. First discover the judgment of personal jurisdiction in the U.S. In these cases I collect some principle and talk about their feasibility. Then turn to our national law’s stipulation discusses weather we should import these principle or not. In this part mainly focuses on the feasibility of Zippo standard and lists the positive and negative opinion to think about the possibility of import this standard. Third, I discuss the question of choice of law. In the same way, starting from the U.S. law, and watching how they treat the internet copyright tort. This part I mainly talk about issue of extraterritoriality, on the other hand, I also mention the substantive law method. From these points I come back see our difficult position and weather the draft amendments can fix these problems. Finally, I mention about personal jurisdiction and choice of law in my opinion, and based on the draft amendments to make the final submission. And I hope I can solve all above problems of internet copyright tort in this part.