- 學位論文
在場人數、強暴迷思對於旁觀者介入之影響─以夜店「撿屍」情境為例
The effects of number of bystanders and rape myth on bystanders intervention—a night club “drunk girls” scenario
若您是本文的作者，可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。
摘要
論文提要內容： 本研究旨在探究在場人數、強暴迷思對於旁觀者反應之影響，並以夜店撿屍情境為例，研究架構主要討論強暴迷思是否為在場人數與旁觀者效應中各階段如好奇度、界定事件嚴重性、責任程度與旁觀反應間之調節變項，自變項為在場人數，並分為單一與多人(二人以上)兩種情境，依變項為旁觀者效應中各階段歷程，強暴迷思則為調節變項，人口變項包括性別、教育程度、年齡與是否去過夜店。 研究對象針對網路上18歲以上的民眾進行線上調查，研究方法採滾雪球抽樣及實驗設計的方式，準備兩種不同情境的撿屍影片隨機撥放，分別為單一旁觀者，即只有受試者看到的情況下；以及多人旁觀者，即除了受試者還有其他旁觀者也在現場的情形，播畢後，填答旁觀者歷程問卷、強暴迷思量表及基本資料，測量受試者對於撿屍事件的反應與態度。施測時間從105年1月5日至105年1月30日，共計回收200份樣本，有效樣本為197份。研究分析發現： 一、強暴迷思愈高，越不傾向上前了解、越不覺得被害人需要被幫助、愈覺得自身干預責任程度低及傾向假裝沒看到之反應，反之亦然。 二、相較於多人的情境，單人情境傾向認為自身責任程度低。 三、低迷思者，在單人情境之責任程度高於多人情境；相反高迷思者，在單人情境下之責任程度低於多人情境。
並列摘要
This research aims to explore the effects of number of bystanders and rape myth on bystanders intervention in a night club “drunk girls” scenario, specifically, whether or not rape myth has a moderate effect on the relationship between the numbers of bystanders and bystander decision process (curiousity, severity of event, responsibility and bystander’s reaction). The number of bystanders was manipulated in two scenarios which were filmed by the researcher. Both scenarios were involved a drunk girl sitting on the street and a male stranger intended to pick her up. In scenario one, the bystander was the only person seen the event; where in scenario two, more than two bystanders passed by. The demographic variables includes sex, age, education level and night club experiences were included as control variables. An online survey was used to collect the data (based on the snowball sample) during January,5,2016 to January,30,2016. 197 valid respondents were collected. Respondents were invited to watch one video randomly selected from the two scenarios. After respondents watched the vedio, they were asked to fill out a questionnaire about bysrander effect, bystander reaction, and rape myth scale. The results indicated (1) respondents with higher rape myth were less interested in approaching the incident, less likely to think the drunk girl were needed to be helped, less responsibility of intervention, and more likely to ignore the event. (2) respondents watched the multiple bystanders video tended to think their responsibilities to intervention were lower. (3) respondents with higher rape myth perceived the higher responsibility in Scenario one, where lower responsibility in Scenario two.
參考文獻
Benokraitis, N. V., & Feagin, J. R. (1995). Modern sexism: Blatant, subtle, and covert discrimination: Pearson College Div.
Bohner, G., Jarvis, C. I., Eyssel, F., & Siebler, F. (2005). The causal impact of rape myth acceptance on men's rape proclivity: Comparing sexually coercive and noncoercive men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(6), 819-828.
Brooks, O. (2011). ‘Guys! Stop doing it!’: young women's adoption and rejection of safety advice when socializing in bars, pubs and clubs. British journal of criminology, 51(4), 635-651.
Burn, S. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex Roles, 60(11-12), 779-792.
Burt, M. R. (1980). Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 217.