- 學位論文
五家補晉書藝文志比較研究
The Study on Comparisons of Five Supplements to Jin Shu Yi Wen Zhi
摘要
史志目錄可反映各朝的圖書文獻與學術文化，但二十五史中僅有七部正史有之，其餘大抵陸續由清朝之後學者所增補，然筆者未見針對補史目錄進行研究之相關專書與學位論文。本論文有鑑於此，將歷代補史目錄進行蒐集，共得一百０五部，除將其表格化著錄出處之外，並概略式加以介紹，以期對補史目錄有清晰的認知。茲以為，魏晉南北朝各國國祚甚短，往往一人跨歷諸多時代，因 此難以明辨古籍文獻的歸屬時間，故擇取五家補《晉書．藝文志》進行探討，以求確切得知該朝文獻，未來更可明確劃分其餘南北朝的書籍。 清朝對《晉書》進行補史目錄編纂者共有五位，依其刊刻時間順序排列為：丁國鈞《補晉書藝文志》、吳士鑑《補晉書經籍志》、文廷式《補晉書藝文志》、黃逢元《補晉書藝文志》、秦榮光《補晉書藝文志》。本論文首先對此五位學者進行生平事蹟與《晉書》相關著作的介紹，使其家世背景與學思歷程能有系統性的整理。之後依照《隋書．經籍志》的分類方式，將五家補晉志所收錄之書目以「經部」、「史部」、「子部」、「集部」、「道經部」、「佛經部」等六大類加以表格化，並歸入附錄進行比較研究。本論文析評五家補晉志之重點有四大方向：其一，「分類之比較」，對於六大類的類目與書目入類的差異進行評論與舉證，以知諸位學者對於晉朝文獻的分類觀點與歸類之正確與否；其二，「著錄書目之比較」，分析五家補晉志著錄書目的體例與名稱之異同，並對其總數量與存佚情形進行確切的統計，以知晉朝文獻之多寡；其三，「著錄撰者之比較」，分析五家補晉志著錄晉朝人名之異同，並對其總數量進行確切的統計，以知當代著書人數之多寡；其四，「援引資料之比較」，先探討五家補晉志著錄資料出處的體例，再以「經部」為觀察焦點，深入研究五位學者援引文獻之異同並統計其總數量，更對其運用資料的方式進行論述與舉證，以知各補晉志之取材來源。 由此可見，藉由本論文之研究，可知歷代補史目錄之種類與多寡、開創補史目錄研究之新方向、明晰五位學者之生平事蹟、考究各補晉志間部類之分合與特色、統計五家補晉志收錄書目與撰者 之多寡，更能瞭解五家補晉志的資料使用方式。這些相關成果對於未來進行晉朝書目之考證、補史目錄之研究與《中國歷代藝文總志》之編纂，相信能有部分裨益與貢獻。
並列摘要
“Yi Wen Zhi” and “Jing Ji Zhi” in “Cheng Shih” (25 historiographies) could reflect the bibliolatry document and academic features of every dynasty. However, only seven historiographies had “Yi Wen Zhi” and “Jing Ji Zhi”, and the rest were almost all augmented by the scholars of Ching Dynasty. After researching the quantity of the augmented parts, there are 105 parts, according to the thesis, which could be the reference for the academics. The thesis believes that Wei Dynasty, Jin Dynasty, and Southern and Northern Dynasties existed for a very short time; therefore, one author would live through different dynasties. Under the circumstances, to which dynasty his masterpieces belonged should be more carefully distinguished so that the confusion won’t occur. For the reason above, this thesis will temporary take Jin Dynasty as an example to research the augmented parts, by scholars of Ching Dynasty, of “Jin Shu” “Yi Wen Zhi”. According to the augment of “Yi Wen Zhi” on “Jin Shu” by the scholars of Ching Dynasty,” the publishing timeline is as follows, “Augment of Yi Wen Zhi on Jin Shu” by Ting Kuo-Chun, “Augment of Jing Ji Zhi on Jin Shu” by Wu Shih-Chien, “Augment of Yi Wen Zhi on Jin Shu” by Wen Ting-Shih, “Augment of Yi Wen Zhi on Jin Shu” by Huang Feng-Yuan, and “Augment of Yi Wen Zhi on Jin Shu” by Qin Jung-Kuang. In the very beginning, the thesis will systematically describe the life and works of these five scholars of Ching Dynasty. On the other hand, the thesis will compare the masterpieces from Jin which were included in the augment of Yi Wen Zhi on Jin Shu by the five scholars. In fact, there are four ways for the comparison. First of all, it compares the viewpoints of the five scholars on the classification of Jin’s masterpieces. Secondly, it compares the differences of the five scholars on the style and the titles of the book. Thirdly, it compares the differences of the five scholars on the prefix of Jin people. Fourth, it compares the differences of the five scholars on the resources of material, and on the acceptance and rejection of material. Through the thesis, we could understand the quantity of the augmented historiographies “Yi Wen Zhi”. Also, we could understand the life of the five scholars who augmented “Yi Wen Zhi” on “Jin Shu”. Moreover, we would learn about the advantages and disadvantages of the five augmented masterpieces.