論民事訴訟法於行政訴訟法上之準用─以言詞審理及事實和證據調查程序為中心

The Discussion on Civic Procedure Law applied to Administer Procedure Law─Focusing on Oral Procedure and the Facts and Evidence of Investigation Procedures Act

林威廷(Wei-Ting Lin)

指導教授 ： 張文郁

國立臺北大學/法律學院/法律學系/碩士(2011年)

摘要

由於我國行政訴訟法並未對於所有行政訴訟程序自為規範，而對於一些訴訟程序規定則係透過準用民事訴訟法相關程序規定。惟若在立法上就相關不應準用之規定而予以明文準用或者應準用之規定而未予明文準用者，可能導致因法院審理上之適用而影響到人民訴訟上之利，故有關民事訴訟法準用於行政訴訟法之議題，有其重要性及討論之價值，實應加以重視。因此本文藉由此等動機嘗試研究此一議題，目的在於希望行政訴訟未來在修正準用民事訴訟法之規定時，能妥適的準用相關規定。本文首先說明我國現行行政訴訟法準用之立法方式，之後探討行政訴訟法與民事訴訟法之間原則上之差異為何之問題，此部分主要係藉由比較兩個訴訟法各自所適用訴訟原則之差異作為探討之方向。並以此最後探討之差異的訴訟原則，作為檢視行政訴訟法所準用民事訴訟法有關言詞審理程序之規定以及有關民事訴訟法事實和證據調查程序規定於行政訴訟法上準用有無違反此一準用界限的標準。最後藉由先前所檢討之結果，就相關於準用上有問題之規定，呼籲於未來修法時能加以檢討而改進。

關鍵字

準用

並列摘要

As for all of China's Administrative Procedure Law is not to regulate administrative proceedings since, for some of the proceedings permitted by the provisions of the Civil Procedure Law Department of the relevant procedural requirements. However, if the legislation on related should not associate with the requirements shall be expressly permitted or shall be allowed to use the provisions were not expressly permitted by, might lead to court on the application of an impact on people's actions on the right, so the Code of Civil Procedure standards for the administrative Procedure Law of the motion to discuss the importance and value, the real attention should be paid. This article attempts to study by such motivation this issue, the purpose of administrative proceedings in the hope that future amendments to the provisions of Code of Civil Procedure mutatis mutandis, can properly be associated with the appropriate standards. This paper shows that our current administrative procedure law permitted the legislation, after the Civil Procedure Law of Administrative Procedure Law and the difference in principle between the question why, this section mainly by comparing the two procedural legal principles applicable to the respective differences as of direction. Finally, we discuss the differences and thus the principle of action, as permitted to view the Administrative Procedure Law Civil Procedure Law of the proceedings of the language provisions and relevant facts and evidence in civil law procedure provided for in the investigation on the Administrative Procedure Law permitted to use without violating the boundaries of this one accurate standards. Finally, previously reviewed by the fruit, in the quasi-spend on the relevant provisions in question, called for amending the law on when the next review and improveme.

並列關鍵字

applied

參考文獻

王澤鑑，法律思維與民法實例－請求權基礎理論體系，2002年5月。

姜世明，民事訴訟法基礎論，3版，2009年9月。

楊建華，問題研析－民事訴訟法（一），1996年11月

楊建華，問題研析－民事訴訟法（二），1995年3月

駱永家，民事舉證責任論，6版，1989年11月。