公私協力推動能源業者企業誠信方案之研究

Study of Energy Business Integrity Program Implementation in View of Public-Private Partnership

邱潔如(CHIU, CHIEH-JU)

指導教授 ： 呂育誠博士

國立臺北大學/公共事務學院/公共行政暨政策學系/碩士(2014年)

摘要

本論文為研究企業反貪政策目標之再定位、探討公私協力理論於推動企業誠信方案之因素與運作內涵及發掘公私協力推動企業誠信之誘因機制，參酌「資源依賴理論」及「合產理論」，輔以「委託代理人理論」及其他公私協力與企業誠信相關概念等文獻資料，以文獻分析法、深度訪談法及個案研究法，研究能源局與能源業者間對公私協力推動企業誠信方案之個別認知看法及對協力機制運作之執行狀況，並發掘執行困境與問題所在及提出未來推動建議。
研究發現對政府推動部分最重要的誘因為建設廉能政府，受訪者針對經濟因素及國際評比部分，認為有正面助益，但尚有其他影響因素，認為推動非百分百即可達成促進經濟發展及提升國際能見度；對企業推動部分，最重要為提升企業形象，因能源產業之壟斷及地域特殊性，雖有降低成本及增加國際合作之機會，但企業較在意的可以提升或維護企業之形象；至於協力推動企業誠信機制部分，公私部門一致意見為利害關係人間僅有承諾互信基礎，其餘共同目標、資源互賴、溝通協調、領導者支持均因方案推動未臻成熟而不明確，歸納問題如下：一、法制面推動強度尚不足；二、方案之策略及措施均未落實公私協力理論：(一)具體策略及執行措施均以政府角度擬定、(二) 績效指標均係以彙整統計資料為主。
藉由研究發現所呈現之問題及其他文獻資料分析，思考未來執行機關與能源業者間應如何透過協力機制，有效運作企業誠信方案，建議如下：一、機關應推動方向：企業誠信法制化、培訓企業誠信種子，成立防止企業貪污之專責小組、規劃誘因機制及建構具辨識度之優質評鑑指標、協力建構觀摩互動平台，並定期彙編企業誠信事件之案例。二、能源業者應推動方向有：持續推動自願性資訊揭露、定期推動員工誠信教育宣導、定期執行內部稽核與積極加入評鑑機制、內設檢舉管道，有效正面處理內部貪污事件、推動社會參與機制。

關鍵字

公私協力 ； 企業誠信 ； 國家廉政建設行動方案 ； 能源業

並列摘要

This paper is a study about reorientation of corporate anti-corruption policy objectives. It explores Public-private partnership theory and operation of the driving factors and the connotation of corporate integrity program. Then it discusses incentives for companies to explore public-private partnership in promoting the integrity mechanism.In addition, "Resource dependence theory ","Co-production theory", "Agent theory", other related literature about public-private partnership and corporate integrity are referenced. With the methods of literature analysis, depth interviews and case studies to study how Bureau of Energy and energy industries think about the corporate integrity program, the implementation status of the public-private cooperation system and discover difficulties and problems in implementation and make recommendations for the future.
The study found that the most important incentive for the government is to construct a clean and effective government. Respondents consider that economic factors and international competitions on anti-corruption policy have positive benefits. However they also think that it is not sufficient that executing anti-corruption policy can lead to economic development and enhance international visibility, there still are other elements concerned. From the enterprises’ point of view, the most important incentive is to enhance the image of themselves. Due to the monopoly and geographic specificity of the energy industry, enterprises can reduce costs and increase opportunities for international cooperation.Nevertheless, enterprises are more concerned about the improvement or maintenance of the image of themselves. Regarding the cooperation in promoting corporate integrity mechanism, the consensus of public and private sector is that there is only basis for mutual trust commitment between stakeholders. The remaining common goals, resource interdependence, communication, coordination, and leaders support are not explicit due to immaturity of programs promoting. The problems are summarized as follows:
1. Promotion of law is still insufficient.
2. The public-private partnership theory is not implemented in strategies and measures of program:
(1) Specific strategies and implementation measures are developed from the viewpoint of government
(2) Performance indicators are based on statistics.

Considering how the executive organ of the government can cooperate effectively with the energy industries on corporate integrity program with cooperation mechanism based on the study and analysis of the related literature, suggestions are made as below:
1. The directions authorities should promote:
(1) Legalizing corporate integrity.
(2) Training corporate integrity seed.
(3) Establishing task force to prevent the corruption of corporates.
(4) Planning an incentive mechanism and constructing evaluation norms with high identification and quality.
(5) Cooperating to construct an interactive platform to observe.
(6) Compiling cases of corporate integrity events regularly.
2. The directions the energy industries should promote:
(1) Promoting voluntary disclosure continuously.
(2) Promoting the education and advocacy of the integrity for staff regularly.
(3) Performing internal audits and actively incorporating evaluation mechanism regularly.
(4) Setting internal report access.
(5) Dealing with internal corruption events effectively and positively.
(6) Promoting social participation mechanisms.

並列關鍵字

Public-private partnership ； Corporate integrity ； National Integrity Building Action Plan ； Energy industry

參考文獻

呂育誠，2004，〈中央與地方夥伴關的省思與展望〉，《中國行政》，75：29-56。

李柏諭，2005，〈公私協力與社區治理的理論與實務：我國社區大學與政府經驗〉，《公共行政學報》，16：59-106。

張世賢、汪家源，2006，〈公私合作提供可持續觀光服務之研究－2005年鶯歌陶瓷嘉年華個案探討〉，《公共事務評論》，7 (1)：99-115。

許士軍，1999，〈新管理典範下的企業倫理〉，《通識教育》，6(3)：35-46。

Ranjit Kumar 著；胡龍騰、黃瑋瑩、潘中道合譯，2000，《研究方法：步驟化學習指南》，臺北：學富文化。