東亞的回應性區域主義:以清邁倡議為例

The Reactionary Regionalism of East Asia：Case of Chiang Mai Initiative（CMI）

謝心瑜(Hsin-Yu Hsieh)

指導教授 ： 郝培芝

國立臺北大學/公共事務學院/公共行政暨政策學系/碩士(2008年)

摘要

相較於歐洲和美洲的區域整合發展，東亞區域整合進成明顯地落後。但在經歷1997年亞洲金融危機此一重大轉捩點後，東亞區域整合開始加速與深。此次金融危機讓東亞各國體認到單靠自身的力量難以抵擋經濟風險，同時認知到東亞區域經濟相互依存的事實，因此，東亞國家建立起「東協加三」機制來回應此外在事件的衝擊，並藉此排除美國勢力，增加東亞各國自主性，也讓強化東亞認同感。對此Mark Beeson認為東亞區域發展本身已有內部分歧性與外部美國介入因素影響，當東亞面臨到外在事件衝擊後，從中排除外部美國勢力並加強東亞區域的自主性，是種有別於歐洲、美洲的區域發展途徑，Beeson稱之為「回應性區域主義」（Reactionary Regionalism）。強調1997年後東亞區域合作機制的深化是被設計來面對外來事件危機時可以減緩與斡旋對其本身的衝擊之回應方式，而2000年成立的「清邁倡議」（Chiang Mai Initiative，CMI ）更是此種回應性區域主義的最佳實踐案例。

本文試圖以「回應性區域主義」為觀點來分析東亞在1997年金融危機之後的區域合作發展，做為本文的研究目的。以Beeson所提出的回應性區域主義為核心基礎，採用驗證方式深入分析東亞區域發展並提出個案研究，觀察分析東亞各國後續的區域發展，並延伸與補充回應性區域主義的不足之處並整理出更加完備的分析觀點，以期能更深入、更細緻地提出更有解釋力觀點來研究東亞的區域整合運作發展，提供東亞區域發展更為清晰與完整的研究。

關鍵字

回應性區域主義 ； 清邁倡議

並列摘要

On the contrary of the regional integration of Europe and America, the regional integration of East Asian fell behind obviously. By experiencing the turning point of Asian financial crisis in 1997, the regional integration was going faster and deeper. Asian financial crisis let East Asian countries recognize that one country can not withstand economic crisis along, in the meanwhile, those East Asian countries also realized the fact that they are interdependent. Thus, to respond this external impact, East Asian countries established ASEAN+3 to exclude the power of U.S. and increase the independence and recognition of East Asian countries. Mark Beeson supposed that East Asian regional development influenced by several factors including internal diversity and external interference of U.S. While East Asian countries faced external impact, they excluded the external power of U.S and reinforce the independence of East Asian region. This regional development path is different from Europe and America. Beeson labeled it as “Reactionary Regionalism.” It emphasized on the East Asian regional cooperation is designed as a method to ease the impact of those external crises. “Chiang Mai Initiative” in 2000 was the best practical example of Reactionary Regionalism.

This study attempt to use Reactionary Regionalism as the study purposes to analyze the East Asian regional cooperation development after Asian financial crisis in 1997. We used Reactionary Regionalism from Beeson as the core basis and used test method to deeply analyze East Asian regional development and address a case study to observe and analyze the following regional development of East Asian countries to extend and add interpretation of the difference of Reactionary Regionalism and address a more complete point of view. We expected to bring up more detailed point of view deeply and precisely to study East Asian regional integration development.

並列關鍵字

Reactionary Regionalism ； Chiang Mai Initiative

參考文獻

Beeson, Mark, 2004, Contemporary Southeast Asia : regional dynamics, national differences. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

王文娟，2004年，〈東亞經濟整合發展現況〉，《經紀前瞻》，第95期，頁88-91。

李文志，2006年，〈亞太貨幣體系發展下APEC的角色與挑戰〉，《政治科學論叢》，第30期，頁21-60。

吳玲君，1998年，〈從東亞金融危機看亞太經合會建制的本質〉，《問題與研究》，第36卷，第6期，頁1-15。

吳玲君，2005年，〈中國與東亞區域經貿合作：區域主義與霸權之間的關係〉，《問題與研究》，第44卷，第5期，頁1-27。