- 學位論文
《諸子平議》校書法研究
The research of the proofreading on "Zhu Zi Ping Yi"
摘要
俞樾（1821-1907），字蔭甫，號曲園，浙江德清人，清末著名的樸學大師。他繼承皖南學派的研究方法與精神，並先後任教於蘇州紫陽書院、上海求志書院、杭州詁經精舍等，培育許多聲名遠播的弟子。俞氏對諸子學的論述，集中於《諸子平議》、《曲園雜纂》、《俞樓雜纂》三書，其中《諸子平議》校注《管子》、《晏子》、《老子》等十五部子書，是他前期研究諸子學的代表作。以下為本論文概要： 本論文共七章，首尾兩章為緒論與結論。 第二章寫清末漢學興盛的背景，並簡述俞樾與學術相關的生平。 第三章交代俞樾撰寫《諸子平議》的動機與過程。 《諸子平議》對十五部子書摘取內容以作校注，第四、第五章皆從《諸子平議》徵引條例為證。第四章以「致誤之因」分析《諸子平議》出校的情形；第五章則先論俞樾治學的三個要點，再以陳垣的「校法四例」探討《諸子平議》的校勘實務。 第六章歸結《諸子平議》的價值與檢討。
並列摘要
Yu Yue (1821-1907) was born in Deqing County of Zhejiang Province, with a surname of Yinfu, nickname as Quyuan, and he was one of the most famous Masters on the Han School of classical philology in the end of Qing Dynasty. The discussions made by Yu Yue on the studies of various philosophies were concentrated on three books, including “Zhu Zi Ping Y(Reason and Principles of Various Philosophies)i”, “Quyuan Za Zuan”, and “Yu Lou Za Zuan”, and amongst them, there were proofreading of fifteen books from various philosophies, such as “Guan Zi”, “Yan Zi”, and “Lao Zi” in the “Zhu Zi Ping Yi”, which was his representational work on the studies of various virtuous men in his early stage. Below is the summary of the paper: The paper is divided into seven chapters, and the beginning and ending chapters are respectively as Introduction and Conclusions. In the second chapter, to talk about the flourishing background of the Han School in the end of Qing Dynasty, as well as to talk briefly on Yu Yue and his life in relation to academic field.In the third chapter, to state the motivation and process of how Yu Yue came to write “Zhu Zi Ping Yi( Reason and Principles of Various Philosophies)”. In the fourth chapter, by way of “reasons of error committing”, to make analysis on the situations of proofreading for “Zhu Zi Ping Yi”. In the fifth chapter, firstly to make discussion on three key points of how Yu Yue pursued his studies, afterwards, using “Four Methods of Collation” from Chen Yuan, to make investigations on the practices of emendation. In the sixth chapter, to make conclusions on the values and examinations of “Zhu Zi Ping Yi”.