透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.12.36.30
  • 學位論文

以島嶼工業生態學觀點探討馬祖之永續發展

A Study of Sustainable Development for the Matsu Islands in the Perspectives of Industrial Ecology

指導教授 : 李育明
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


摘要 本研究欲了解馬祖地區物質流流動現象,以及馬祖地區未來能否形成永續低碳島嶼,因此本研究應用工業生態學之物質流分析探討馬祖地區資源使用之情況,回顧有關低碳家園、社區及島嶼工業生態學、低碳島與再生能源生活圈相關案例,藉此分析馬祖地區未來形成低碳島嶼之可能,並擬訂其低碳相關發展策略。 馬祖地區因擁有特殊地理條件,島內之物質多為進口,由WRI之物質流平衡架構可分析馬祖地區在物質投入中,取用於環境之資源量遠不及進口之農礦產品、半成品及最終產品,綜合整理分析結果馬祖地區2008年進口物質以建築材料253,445公噸為最大宗,排放至環境之污染以水污染218,892公噸最大宗;2009年進口物質以建築材料255,442公噸為最大宗,排放至環境之污染產出部分則以水污染215,835公噸最大宗。 由本研究彙整低碳指標及經本研究估算後,在低碳發展初步評估馬祖地區並無邁向低碳島嶼之可能,顯示島內在節能方面應提高使用效率,更應在生活上採行可符合低溫室氣體排放的消費與行為模式。

並列摘要


Abstract This study aimed to find out the material flow status of Matsu islands and whether the area could become sustainable and convert into low-carbon islands in the future. Therefore, we applied material flow analysis (MFA) of industrial ecology (IE) to estimate the use of resources on the islands, and reviewed the related case studies of low-carbon homeland, low-carbon communities, IE of islands, low-carbon island and renewable energy living spheres, in order to analyze the possibility of Matsu area transform into low-carbon islands in the future; furthermore, to conclude the related strategies of low-carbon development. Because of its special geographical circumstances, almost all materials are imported. The study analyzed material input into the area by applying the MFA frame illustrated from The World Resources Institute (WRI), domestic resources are much less than its imports (commodities, semi-finished products and final products). Concluding the results of analysis, building material (253,445 MT) was the major import of Matsu in year 2008 and the major pollutant was wastewater (218,892MT). In 2009, building material amounted to 255,442MT and wastewater amounted to 215,835MT. In conclusion, the study estimated that it’s hard for Matsu to become a low-carbon islands. The study suggests that Matsu should improve its energy efficiency to save more energy and carry out a low greenhouse gas (GHG) emission consumption and behavior in their daily lives.

參考文獻


2. 行政院環境保護署,2010,低碳家園推動策略研討會會議資料。
1. Ayres, R.U. and C.J.M. van den Bergh, 2005, “A theory of economic growth with material/energy resources and dematerialization: Interaction of three growth mechanisms”. Ecological Economics 55: 96-118.
2. Bernardini, O., and R. Galli, 1993, “Dematerialization: Long-Term Trends in the Intensity of Use of Materials and Energy”. Futures 25(4): 431-448.
6. Chertow, M. R., 2000, “Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonom”, Annual Review of Energy and the environment, 25, pp. 313-337.
7. Cleveland, J. C. and M. Ruth, 1999, “Indicators of Dematerialization and the Materials Intensity of Use”, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Volume 2, Number 3, p15-50.

延伸閱讀