透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.21.34.0
  • 學位論文

我國上市櫃公司財務危機預警機率模型之建構與驗證

The Construction and Validation of Financial Distress Prediction Probability Model for Taiwan Listed and OTC Companies

指導教授 : 黃瑞靜

摘要


本研究以台灣上市櫃公司為研究對象,主要研究目的在建構穩定且具預測力的企業財務危機預警模型。此外,本研究並比較以Cascaded Logistic Regression建構之模型與以Logit Regression模型在使用相同研究變數下模型間的差異。為建立穩定且具預測力的企業財務危機預警模型,本研究在研究年度的選取、樣本配對、配對標準與研究變數的選擇上均經過詳細考慮與檢驗。為驗證本研究模型預測的穩定性,本研究共分為三階段對預警模型進行穩定性驗證。結果發現,即使檢驗時間離模型建構期間不斷增加,模型對於區別出未來發生財務危機的公司依然具有絕佳的預測能力及穩定性。在Cascaded Logistic Regression建構模型與以Logit Regression建構模型的部份,其彼此間的差異並不大,這也顯示出Cascaded Logistic Model在縮減變數的同時,模型並不會降低對正常公司區別率、整體區別正確率、Tpye I Error與模型解釋力。

並列摘要


This paper uses the listed and OTC companies in Taiwan as a sample. The main goal attempts to construct a stable prediction model. In addition, this research compares the differences of using the same variables in Cascaded Logistic Regression and Logit Regression. In order to establish stable and useful financial distress prediction model, we pass through the detailed consideration and validation in the research year selection, the sample pairs, the standard of pairs and the research variables choice. Support Logit Model and three stages of examination are proposed to predict financial distress. In empirical results, our model has excellent forecasting ability and stability following time passing. The final part section compares the differences between Cascaded Logistic Regression and Logistic Regression, its differences between each other aren’t big.

參考文獻


[11]黃振豊、呂紹強,“企業財務危機預警模式之研究-以財務及非財務因素構建”,當代會計,第一卷第一期,2000,第19-40頁。
[2]Beaver, W.H., “Financial ratios as predictors of failure”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol.4, 1966, pp.71-111.
[3]Altman, E. I., “Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy”, Journal of Finance, Vol.22, 1968, pp.589-609.
[4]Altman, E. I.,“PREDICTING FINANCIAL DISTRESS OF COMPANIES:REVISITING THE Z-SCORE AND ZETA® MODELS”, adapted and updated from Altman (1968) and Altman (1977), 2000.
[5]Altman, E. I., G. G. Haldeman, and P. Narayanan, “Zeta Analysis: A New Model to Identify the Bankruptcy Risk of Corporations”, Journal of Banking and Finance, Vol. 1, 1977, pp.29-54.

被引用紀錄


李嘉昇(2011)。企業違約風險探討〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2011.01352
楊致傑(2009)。銀行授信風險管理之實證分析〔碩士論文,中原大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6840/cycu200900954
方志哲(2009)。尋找財務危機公司〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2009.02544
蔡佩玲(2009)。以違約距離、違約指標與公司治理指標預測公司違約風險〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-1111200915521570
蔡長裕(2010)。以財務比率衡量企業財務危機預警模型之實證研究〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0206201020245000

延伸閱讀