垃圾焚化廠公有民營營運績效評估之研究-以永康垃圾資源回收(焚化)廠為例

Operational Performance of a BOT Incineration Plant: A Case Study of Yong Kang Municipal Waste-to-energy Incineration Plant

康雯琳(Wen-Lin Kang)

指導教授 ： 李志賢

崑山科技大學/工程學院/環境工程研究所/碩士(2010年)

摘要

目前台灣地區垃圾處理，以區域性綜合規劃為原則，配合都會區之發展，垃圾處理應以焚化為主，掩埋為輔之政策。而全國已有24座垃圾焚化廠，其中5座採公有公營方式辦理，另16座則在考量減少政府財務及人力負擔下，決定採公有民營方式辦理。因此本研究蒐集相關文獻、環保政策法規、臺南縣永康焚化廠及北部某焚化廠A營運資料，期望探討已營運中之公有民營垃圾焚化廠實際執行情形，並比較公有公營垃圾焚化廠運作情況，評估其效益及面臨之問題。經過研究綜合整理及比較分析後，發現公有民營方式不論成本效益、人力成本效率、服務效率、目標達成率（焚化率）、能源回收率指標及焚化操作使用情形（操作率）皆優於公有公營方式，且有效減少政府財務及人力負擔。

關鍵字

垃圾焚化廠 ； 公有民營

並列摘要

At present in Taiwan, the main principal of waste treatment is “major for incineration, minor for landfill”, which is also dependent on the integrated regional planning as well as urban development. Until 2010, there are 24 incineration plants, including 5 by “public owner public operation” and others by “public owner private operation”. The policy of “public owner private operation” concerns governmental finances and human power. This study first collected related literature, including laws and policies of environmental protection and others. Two case-study plants, one for “public owner private operation”, another for “public owner public operation”, are selected to compare with their differences. Discussion of the performance is focused on the indicators of cost-benefit analysis, human-power efficiency, service efficiency, goal-achievement rate, energy recovery, and annual operation of incineration. The results show all the indicators of “public owner private operation” are better than those of “public owner public operation”. This can benefit the government for reducing financial loading.

並列關鍵字

Operational Performanc ； BOT Incineration Plant

參考文獻

[1] 行政院環境保護署環境檢驗所ttp://www.niea.gov.tw/

[7] Wiles, C. C.,“Municipal Solid Waste Combustion Ash: State-of the knowledge”, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 47(1-3), pp.325-344 (1996).

[8]黃奕叡，”廢棄物焚化灰渣熱熔之研究”，碩士論文，成功大學環境工程研究所 (2002)。

[12] Savas, E. S., Privatization: The Key to Better Government, Chatham House Publishers, Inc. (1987).

[13]Salamon, L. M, Beyond Privatization: The Tools of Government Action, Washington D. C.：The Urban Institute Press (1989).