透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.68.179
  • 學位論文

過度反應對股價之影響-以股票選擇權之隱含波動率為例

The Value Effect of Overreaction?-A Study Using Implied Volatility from STO

指導教授 : 黃志祥
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本文主旨在檢視我國股票市場是否存在價格反轉之過度反應現象。過去之實證研究皆強調價值效應(Value Effect),解釋上認為投資者過度反應成長類型之股票(此處定義為本益比高或價格高之股票),而在長期時段下價值類型股票(value stocks)之表現優於成長類型股票(growth stocks)。 Stein(1989)以一階自我相關均數複迴模型之隱含波動率(implied volatility),來解釋投資人過度反應之現象。對於以隱含波動率來探討是基於股價之波動具有複迴平均值的反彈效應(mean reversion),長期時段之波動幅度(long-term implied volatility)應低於短期時段之波動幅度(short-term implied volatility),長期時段波動幅度與短期時段波動幅度之相關係數(correlation)接近1,以此呈現過度反應之證據。 本文使用Stein(1989)之方法,並以國內股票選擇權(STO)價格的隱含波動率(Implied Volatility from STO)來檢驗過度反應(Overreaction)之程度,是否在成長類型股票與價值類型股票有所不同。 實證之結果為長期股票選擇權組合比短期股票選擇權組合有過度反應現象,而成長類型股票選擇權組合實證?值與理論?值之差距(0.3669)小於價值類型股票選擇權組合實證?值與理論?值之差距(0.4053),則可提出成長類型股票選擇權組合比價值類型股票選擇權組合有過度反應現象不存在。

並列摘要


This study aimed to examine if there was any over-reacting price reversal in the stock market in Taiwan. Most of the previous studies had focused on value effects. According to their interpretations, investors overreacted to growth stocks (defined as stocks of high PERs or high prices), and the performance of value stocks was better than that of growth stocks in the long run. Stein (1989) used the implied volatility of the first-order self-correlation multiple regression to explain investors' over-reaction. The implied volatility was based on the multiple regression mean reversion of stock price volatility. Long-term implied volatility should be lower than short-term implied volatility should, and their correlation should be close to 1. These were used as proofs of over-reaction. This study applied the method adopted by Stein (1989) and used the implied volatility from STO prices to examine the degrees of over-reaction and find out if they were different between growth stocks and value stocks. The actual results showed that the degree of over-reaction was higher with long-term STO combinations than with short-term STO combinations. The difference between actual ? value and theoretical value of STO combinations for growth stocks (0.3667) was lower than that for value stocks (0.4053). Therefore, this study proposed that the phenomena of stronger over-reaction to STO combinations with growth stocks than with value stocks did not exist.

參考文獻


[8]林憬鳳,2006,“股票購回過度反應-行為財務之實證研究”,私立中原大學會計研究所碩士論文。
[19]郭文忠,許雅恩,2003,“認購權證市場之過度反應現象探討”,風險管理學報,第五卷,第一期,91-108。
[18]陳勁甫、鄧仲傑,2003,“不同波動模型對認購權證訂價績效衡量之研究”,朝陽商管評論, 2 第 2 頁 25-50。
[28]Basu, S., 1977, “The Investment performance of common stocks in relation to their price to earnings ratios: A test of the efficient markets hypothesis”, Journal of Finance, 32, pp. 663-682.
[29]Basu, S1983,“The Relationship between Earnings Yield, Market Value, and Return for NYSE Common Stocks”, Journal of Financial Economics, pp.126-156, December.

延伸閱讀