整體體驗、品牌知名度、品牌聯想、知覺品質、品牌情感及品牌忠誠度之關聯探討

Holistic Experiences, Brand Awareness, Brand Associations, Perceived Quality, Brand Affect, and Brand Loyalty

曾祥景(Hsiang-Zing Tseng)

指導教授 ： 丁承

國立交通大學/管理學院/經營管理研究所/碩士(2009年)

https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2009.00376

摘要

隨著服務商品化及客製化，體驗經濟時代已經來臨。每個人對真實性都有需求。體驗是提供真實性的一種有力方式，因此以顧客體驗為中心的管理哲學已經興起。這可以在2009年學術界對顧客體驗此領域的重視看出。本研究順應此研究潮流，欲連結體驗策略與品牌相關構面之間的關係。其中以整體體驗為投入，品牌忠誠度為終極目標(效果)。主要的研究目的如下：第一，整合相關理論釐清整體體驗、品牌情感、品牌權益構面之間的關係。第二，探討體驗策略的效果性。第三，探討體驗策略的效率性。研究的品牌為自2003年9月後實行體驗行銷的麥當勞。實體調查了十七家麥當勞的顧客，總共313位。抽樣方法為立意抽樣。分析方法主要為線性結構模式。研究發現如下:第一，整體體驗、品牌情感與品牌權益構面之間的關係並非可由氛圍學中的認知-情感或情感-認知理論單獨解釋。因為在效應層級模式考量在內時，認知-情感的中介效果及經驗層級皆可達成效果而情感-認知理論的中介效果不成立。第二，體驗策略的效果性而言，顧客對品牌的情感、知覺品質、品牌知名度/品牌聯想扮演完全中介的角色。其中直接訴諸於品牌情感的整體體驗的效果大大超過先訴諸於品牌認知層面再訴諸於品牌情感的效果。第三，就體驗策略的效率性而言，關聯體驗應分最多資源、感官體驗最少。核心管理意涵為宏觀的規劃整體體驗以有效率、有效果的達成體驗目標。最後提出結論、限制與未來研究方向。

關鍵字

整體體驗 ； 效應層級模式 ； 認知-情感理論 ； 情感-認知理論 ； 品牌權益 ； 品牌情感 ； 策略資源安排

並列摘要

As the commercialization and customization of service, here comes the experience economy. Everyone has a quest for authenticity. Staging experiences is one way of offering authenticity. Therefore, management philosophies that have a focus on customer experiences have sprung up as can be seen in academic journals in 2009. We follow these research streams and try to relate experience strategies to relevant dimensions of brand where holistic experience strategies was input and brand loyalty was the final goal. Main research purposes were shown below. First, the relationship among holistic experiences, brand affect, and brand equity dimensions were examined. Second, the effectiveness of experience strategies was examined. Third, the efficiency of experience strategies was examined. The research brand was McDonald’s, an experience stager since September 2003. We physically surveyed 313 customers in 17 chain stores of McDonald’s. Purposive sampling was performed. Analytical method was SEM. Key research findings were as follows. First, unlike atmospherics context, it is deficient to explain the responses of customers under cognition-emotion or emotion-cognition intervening mechanisms alone in the experience context. More intervening mechanisms should be included such as hierarchy-of-effect model in our study. Second, strategies appealed to the brand affect directly had the larger effectiveness than those appealed to the cognitive dimensions of brand, and then brand affect. Third, to attain efficiency, relate experiences ranked first and should be assigned the most resource while sense experiences ranked the least. Core managerial implication was to urge experience managers holistically planning their experience strategies to attain the experiential goal effectively and efficiently. Conclusion, limitations, and future research directions were presented in the end.

並列關鍵字

Holistic experiences ； hierarchy-of-effect model ； cognition-emotion theory ； emotion-cognition theory ； brand equity ； brand affect ； strategic resource allocation

參考文獻

﹝2﹞Aaker, David A. (1992), “ Managing the Most Important Asset: Brand Equity,” Planning Review, Vol. 20(5), 56-58.

﹝4﹞Aaker, David A. (1996), “Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets,” California Management Review, Vol 38(3), 102-120.

﹝5﹞Adaval, Rashmi (2003), “ How Good Gets Better and Bad Gets Worse: Understanding the Impact of Affect on Evaluations of Known Brands,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 30(3), 352-367.

﹝6﹞Agarwal, M.K., V.R. Rao (1996), “ An Empirical Comparison of Consumer-Based Measures of Brand Equity,” Marketing Lett., Vol. 7(3), 237-247.

﹝7﹞Ailawadi, Kusum L., Donald R. Lehmann, and Scott A. Neslin (2003), “ Revenue Premium as an Outcome Measure of Brand Equity,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 67(5), 1-17.