當代新竹六張犁林姓聚落之地景變遷與認同（1971-2013）

Contemporary Landscape Change and Identity of The Lin Settlement at Liuzhangli in Hsinchu（1971-2013）

羅玉伶(Yu-Ling Lo)

指導教授 ： 羅烈師

國立交通大學/客家文化學院/客家文化學院客家社會與文化學程/碩士(2014年)

https://doi.org/10.6842/NCTU.2014.00723

摘要

六張犁，一處北台灣聞名的林姓單姓客家聚落，兩百多年後，卻消逝在現今地圖上，取而代之的是特意形塑、具文化象徵的「六家民俗公園」。昔日的農村田野已被高樓大廈取代。此一劇變起源於廿一世紀具農村殺手之稱的都市計畫，短短十年間促使地景丕變，人口遽增。相對於聚落外的高樓林立，公園內保留的六座傳統建築、兩座傳統寺廟，與新建的交通大學客家文化學院土樓意象建築，顯得壁壘分明。聚落原住戶與社區新住戶是如何詮釋此地景？本研究以「在地關懷」為出發點，探究歷史與社會發展下，地景與認同間的連結。
筆者認為，即使地景變遷，人們仍難以割捨對於地景的認同，且六張犁聚落內富涵「多種認同關係」，故本研究探討問題有四：1.六張犁聚落保留下來的地景有哪些？保留原因為何？2.這些地景的關鍵行動者分別為何？3.不同行動者對保留與興建的地景象徵性與認同關係為何？4.如何詮釋地景象徵性與認同關係的共通性與差異性？
因此，筆者進行文獻分析、深度訪談及（祭祀、社區活動）參與觀察，配合理論架構，期盼能提供一份六家地區較完整的人地關係學術論文。

關鍵字

地景象徵 ； 地景變遷 ； 都市計畫 ； 單姓聚落 ； 新竹六張犁 ； 認同

並列摘要

Liuzhangli was a well-known Hakka settlement in northern Taiwan, with all the inhabitant having a single-surname, the Lins. Two hundred years have passed, the settlement has since disappeared from the contemporary map, and instead was replaced by a specially shaped and culturally symbolized park called “Liujia Folk Park”, with modern skyscrapers substituted for farms in former times. The drastic changes was caused by twenty first century urban plannings, killers of rural villages,which fostered great changes in landscape and rapid growth in population. Compared with the tall buildings outside of the settlement, the park has preserved six traditional buildings, and two traditional temples, all quite distinguishable from the newly-built tulou building image of the College of Hakka Study at NCTU. How did the settlement residents and the community interpret the changes of the landscape? This study would like to begin with the local concern and discover the connection between the landscape and identity under the historical and social development.
In spite of all the changes in landscape, this study believes that it was still very difficult for people to part with identity in landscape. In addition, the Liuzhangli settlement contains various relationships to identity. Hence, the present study aims at four questions: 1) What were the landscapes preserved in Liuzhangli settlement? Why were they preserved? 2) Who were the key agents of these landscapes? 3) For different key agents, what were those relationships of identity between the preserved and newly-constructed landscape symbolization? 4) How to interpret the commonness and difference between the landscape symbolization and identity?
Thus, this study carries out relevant literature analysis, in depth interviews, and the observations on ancestral worship and local community events. Under the thesis guidelines and frameworks, this study hopes to depict a picture of the complete relationship between the people and the landscape in Liujia District.

並列關鍵字

landscape symbolization ； landscape change ； urban planning ； single-surnamed settlement ； Liuzhangli in Hsinchu ； identity

參考文獻

丁仁傑，2012，〈全球化下的地方性：臺南西港刈香中的時間、空間與村際網絡〉，《臺灣人類學刊》，10（1）：93-158。

陳賢仙，2012，《歷史建築聚落保存再利用之探討-以竹北市六張犁聚落、新瓦屋聚落為例》。中原大學建築研究所碩士學位論文。

劉如意，2010，《社區如何展現能動性：在地與空間的研究，以台灣竹北六家地區為例》。暨南大學人類學研究所碩士學位論文。

Cosgrove, D. and Daniels, S. eds., 1988, The Iconography of Landscape: Essays on the Symbolic Representation, Design and Use of Past Environments.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hirsch, E. and O’Hanlon, M. eds., 1995, The Anthropology of Landscape: Perspectives on Place and Space. Oxford: Clarendon Press.