情資交換與刑事司法互助間之衝突與調和－以建構我國未來相關法制為中心

本文旨在討論我國警察機關長久以來與世界各國執法機關在合作打擊跨國犯罪之實務作法，其成效卓越非凡。惟我國與外國合作打擊跨國犯罪應統一制定內國準據法，法務部基於主管機關地位，未來將針對「國際刑事司法互助」及「情資交換」等程序進行規範，制訂「國際刑事偵查及執行互助法」。該法草案特別將「情資交換」部分納入，有意將各司法警察機關於執行國際刑事偵查、情資交換、案件協查等犯罪調查互助部分，直接受該法限制與規範。本文企圖在本法架構下如何調和警察「犯罪調查互助」與「刑事司法互助」事項於本質上之衝突差異，同時不減損我國警察機關與外國警察機關進行「情資交換」必須立於「迅速與即時」之實益與核心價值下，輔論以國際立法趨勢，並對於該草案提出若干修正意見，冀能對制訂我國警察機關日後在執行合作打擊跨國犯罪之法源有所助益。

關鍵字

打擊跨國犯罪；情資交換；犯罪調查互助；國際刑事偵查及執行互助法

並列摘要

This article points out that the successful cooperation between National Police Agency and world-wide law enforcement agencies has been a great model. However, Ministry of Justice, the competent legislative authority, considered such international cooperation should be standing on the legal basis. That is to enact an applicable law to regulate “International Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters” and “Exchange of Information and Intelligence”. The “Draft of International Criminal Investigation and Legal Assistance Execution Law” is consequently established. This draft especially subsumes regulations on “Exchange of Information and Intelligence”, which would also bring “Police Assistance”, such as international criminal investigation cooperation, exchange of criminal information and intelligence etc., directly into regulation. This article suggests that the concepts of “legal assistance” and “police assistance” in its substantial conflict and legal divergence can be adjusted and coordinated in light of enforcing the law and upholding the core value of “instant and real time” information exchange by police authority. It also provides essential and beneficial legal suggestions concerning anti-transnational crimes of police cooperation in the draft.

並列關鍵字

combating transnational crimes ； exchange of Information and intelligence ； police assistance ； Draft of International Criminal Investigation and Legal Assistance Execution Law

參考文獻

1.王兆鵬，《刑事訴訟講義》，元照出版，臺北(2010)。（Wang, Chao-Pen, Lectures of Criminal Procedure Law, Angel Publishing, Taipei(2010).）

2.林東茂，＜德國的組織犯罪及其法律上的對抗措施＞，《刑法雜誌》，第37卷第3期，頁1-3，1993年7月。（Lin, Don-Mao, Germany Organized Crime and Legal Measures on Its Prevention, Criminal Law Publishing, vol. 37, no.3, at 1-3, July, 1993.）

一、中文書籍

Google Scholar

2.許文義，《個人資料保護法論》，三民出版，臺北（2001）。（Hsu, Wen-Yih, Theory of Personal Information Protection Law, Sanmin Publishing, Taipei(2001).）

Google Scholar

3.黃肇炯，《國際刑法概論》，四川大學出版社初版，成都（1992）。（Huang, Zao-June, Introduction to International Criminal Code, 1st ed., Sichuan University Press Publishing, Chengdu（1992.）

Google Scholar

被引用紀錄

林振耀（2014）。「海峽兩岸共同打擊犯罪及司法互助協議」簽署後我國警察機關執行成效之研究〔碩士論文，國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2014.00382

章振國（2014）。全球化下兩岸打擊跨境犯罪之合作策略與挑戰〔碩士論文，國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613581402

延伸閱讀

蘇凱平（2020）。重新探索自由心證：以憲法與刑事訴訟法的價值衝突與解決為核心。臺大法學論叢，49(1)，339-401。https://doi.org/10.6199/NTULJ.202003_49(1).0007
邱聯恭（1991）。司法之現代化與律師之任務（十一）－律師即法之協同探尋者、紛爭預防者、生活策劃者。律師通訊，(147)，32-44。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000084-199112-x-147-32-44-a
廖宗聖、林燦璋（2011）。主權觀念轉變下的刑事司法互助模式之探討。中正大學法學集刊，(35)，1-73。https://doi.org/10.30094/NCCULJ.201110.0001
邱映曦（2013）。A Discussion of the Influence from Personal Data Protection Legislation to the Concept of Inner Management and Information Security within an Organization。資訊安全通訊，19(1)，119-132。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=a0000270-201301-201301300053-201301300053-119-132
陳清秀（2019）。The doctrine of observing old law in the substantive legal relationship and observing new law in the procedural legal relationship and the principle of no ex post facto law in administrative law。東吳法律學報，31(2)，1-45。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=02593750-201910-202002190012-202002190012-1-45

國際替代計量

情資交換與刑事司法互助間之衝突與調和－以建構我國未來相關法制為中心

全文下載

主題瀏覽