透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.139.89.220
  • 學位論文

外資買賣超對投資績效的影響-以台灣50指數為例

The effect of Foreign Institutional Investors trading-by the Taiwan 50 Index

指導教授 : 周冠男
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


外來專業投資機構為外資之主要成份。在外資投資訊息隨手可得的今日,其買賣超資訊是否具參考價值?若一般人追隨外資腳步投資,有無獲利空間?本研究觀察由外資前十大買超個股所形成之投資組合,並與台灣五十指數比較。實證結果,無論觀察期間為一個月、二個月或是三個月,都無法帶給投資人顯著的報酬。過去的研究大多只觀察外資買超當日或次日的股價變動。本研究認為訊息反應需要時間,故延長投資組合持有期間與觀察期間,俾觀察隱含資訊是否存在、是否反應在投資組合報酬上。但實證結果發現,外資買超資訊似未包含值得投資人注意的訊息。

關鍵字

台灣50 外資買賣超

並列摘要


As the daily trading activity of Foreign Institutional Investors (FINI), including net buying and net selling of individual, is readily available from the public media, can accessing and acting on this data provide any real opportunity for local individual investors? To answer this questions we set out to determine whether or not a 10-stock portfolio designed to shadow FINI investor activity over one, two and three months could outperform the market as measured by the Taiwan 50 Index. The results indicate that a portfolio made up of the top-10 net bought stocks by FINI does not exhibit spectacular market beating returns on a one, two or three month timeframe for individual investors. Thus, it seems that investors have little to gain from the FINI investment activity data. Furthermore, the study shows that there is a considerable lag between the time FINI data become available and the time that it can be mimicked. Perhaps some advantage would reveal itself if we were to extend the tracking period beyond three months, but based on the study above it appears that following in FINI’s footsteps is an ill-advised, or at best neutral, investment strategy for individual investors.

參考文獻


﹝12﹞劉炆明著,外資買賣超交易資訊對股價波動影響之研究,中原大學企業管理研究所碩士論文,民國89年6月。
﹝1﹞Close, N, “Price Reaction to Large Transaction in the Canadian Equity Markets,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol.31, No.6, Nov 1975, pp.50-57.
﹝4﹞Harris, L. and E. Gruel, “Price and Volume Effects Associated with Changes in the S&P 500 list : New Evidence for the Existence of Price Pressures, ” Journal of Finance, Vol.41, No.4, Sep. 1986, pp.815-829.
﹝5﹞Kraus, A. and H.R. Stoll, “Price Impacts of Block Trading on the New York Stock Exchange, ” Journal of Finance, Jun. 1972, pp.569-588.
﹝6﹞Reilly, F.K. and D.J. Wright, “Block Trading and Aggregate Stock Price Volatility,” Financial Analysts Journal, Vol.40, No.2, Mar.-Apr. 1984, pp.54-60.

被引用紀錄


呂怡萍(2010)。三大法人買賣超對台灣50與大盤指數的影響之研究〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2010.00230
張耀云(2012)。三大法人買賣超對台股指數報酬之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU.2012.10622
吳佩姍(2012)。三大法人買賣超與股票報酬橫斷面離散性的關係〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-0207201218440000
陳姿伶(2012)。本地機構投資人與資訊不對稱之關聯性研究〔碩士論文,國立中正大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0033-2110201613495660
范聖培(2014)。三大法人之買賣超行為對股價短期報酬之研究〔碩士論文,國立中央大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0031-0412201511584572

延伸閱讀