透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.147.104.248
  • 學位論文

社區菁英對社區營造影響研究-以雲林縣北港鎮與嘉義縣新港鄉為例

指導教授 : 廖坤榮教授
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


近年來,社區總體營造成為臺灣在推動社區工作與民主改造的重要政策,透過社區營造的方法,能夠凝聚整合社區居民的共識與力量,促成社區的集體行動,並提供社區居民參與公共事務的管道。在社區營造過程中,社區菁英的參與與行動,一直都是社區能否進一步發展的主要變數,並且在有限的社區資源分配與社區營造執行上,具有非常重要的影響力。 本研究大致分為兩部份進行探討,第一部份是透過公民參與模式、權力基進與菁英觀點、議程設定與社群組構等多層次的理論觀點,導引出社區菁英在社區營造過程中的地位與重要性;第二部份則是在前述理論基礎的建立下,藉由對北港鎮與新港鄉社區營造的研究比較,探討社區菁英經由社區權力建構、議程設定與社群組構過程對於農村型社區的影響。 研究結果也發現,社區菁英參與的背景與動機,確實會影響社區菁英在議程設定與社群組構的發展,並且在議程設定的論述與社區居民的認同下,進一步影響社區資源的分配、居民集體行動的方向、社區組織的競合,而社區菁英也在議程設定與資源共享過程中,獲得維持決策權力與優勢組構的機會。

並列摘要


In recent years, the community empowerment is the important policy to promote community work and democratic transformation in Taiwan. Using the methods of community empowerment can be integrated the community consensus and strength of the community residents, developed the collective action in community, and provided the way to participate the public affairs for the community residents. In the process of community empowerment, community participation and action of elites are the key variables in community development, and the most important influence on distribution of community resources and implementation of community-building. This research is divided into two parts. First, through the viewpoint of several theories, such as the citizen participation model, the radical view of power elite, agenda setting and the figuration, we found the community elite’s status and importance in the process of community empowerment. Second, according to foresaid theories, this study focuses on comparing the community empowerments between Beigang Township in Yunlin counity and Singang Township in Chia-yi county, and discusses the role that community elites play in these township and the way the community elite by participate in which sight of power construction, agenda setting and community figuration is based . This research also found that the participation background and motivation of community elites affect community agenda setting and development of figuration, and have the significant influences on the assignment of community resources, the direction of collective action, and the compete of community organizes. Moreover, the community elites can also get and hold the power as a decision maker and have the opportunity to dominate figuration.

參考文獻


吳英明(1994).〈公私部門協力關係和「公民參與」之探討〉。《中國行政評論》,第2卷3期:1-14。台北:中華民國公共行政學會。
吳靜吉(2011).〈權力不穩激勵弱權者發揮創意〉。《今周刊》,773期:28。台北:今周刊文化事業股份有限公司。
陳錦煌、翁文蒂(2003).〈以社區總體營造推動終身學習建構公民社會〉。《國家政策季刊》,2卷3期:63-90。台北:行政院研究發展考核委員會。
陳世榮(2006).〈國家與地方社會的互動:近代社會菁英的研究典範與未來的研究趨勢〉。《中央研究院近代史研究所集刊》,第54期:129-168。台北:中央研究院近代史研究所。
劉立偉(2008).〈社區營造的反思:城鄉差異的考量、都市發展的觀點、以及由下而上的理念探討〉。《都市與計劃》,35卷4期:313-338。台北:中華民國都市計劃學會。

延伸閱讀