摘 要 「個人資料保護法」於民國101年10月施行,此次修法,除了修正舊法諸多不合時宜之規定外,更參酌「APEC隱私權保護綱領」及國內外實務狀況來訂定;本文係參照個人資料保護法之第一章總則(第1至14條)及第二章公務機關對個人資料之蒐集、處理及利用(第15至18條)之規定,從法制面上探討目前個資法在公務機關及戶政機關之實施現況分析;並依據「APEC隱私保護九大原則」為理論架構之基礎,來延伸探討戶政機關戶籍資料與個人資料保護之關係,再以臺南市戶政機關為研究對象,探討目前戶政機關在蒐集、處理、及利用戶籍資料上,如何去因應所面臨之個人資料保護問題。 戶政機關所保有之戶籍資料,可謂為最完整之個人資料;惟依戶籍法之規定來看,並未就戶籍資料在隱私保障上有任何之規範,而僅是政府部門如何蒐集、處理、及利用人民戶籍資料之單方規定;故現行戶籍法是否足夠因應戶籍資料之各種隱私保護,以及戶籍資料在運用現況上有否逾越合法性與適用性,似有必要就現行實際執行面之作法,來加以檢討及修正規範。爰此,於本文第五章中,筆者以個資法在臺南市戶政機關之實施現況,用以分析臺南市戶政機關在「APEC隱私保護原則」上,存在有哪些個人資料保護之問題,進而針對各項問題缺失,於第六章中提出相關之改善意見及總體之政策建議。
Abstract "Personal Data Protection Act" was implemented on October 1, 2012. The revised law not only corrects many untimely provisions of the old law, also refers to the "APEC privacy program" and the situation in Taiwan and other countries. This article refers to the first (Section 1-14) and second (Article 15-18) chapter of Personal Data Protection Act, which mentions about how government agency collect, handle and utilize the personal data. Moreover, it also investigate the situation of the government agency and the production country household politics institution. According to the "Nine APEC Privacy Principles", it discuss the relationship between the personal data and the production country household politics institution. Tainan production country household politics institution, as the research object, investigate how the production country household politics institution collect, handle and utilize the household register data when they confront the issues about personal data protection. Census data by household tenure of office is described as the most complete personal information; except in accordance with the provisions of the Household Registration Law, the census data has not had any of the norms on privacy protection, but only the unilateral regulations of how government departments to collect, process, and the use of census data of the People; therefore, is the existing household registration law adequate in response to the various census data privacy protection or not and does the use of census data on the current situation have crossed the legitimacy and applicability seem necessary to practice on the existing surface of the actual implementation to be reviewed and amended specification. Thus, in the fifth chapter, the author takes a funded status of implementation of the law in Tainan’s household administration authorities to analyze on the presence of what personal data protection issues of household authorities in Tainan on the "APEC Privacy Principles". According to the shortage of various issues, the author gives them advice and suggestions related to the overall policy in Chapter 6.