透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.31.104
  • 學位論文

我國專利除罪化之回顧

Review on the Decriminalization of Taiwan's Patent Law

指導教授 : 陳文吟
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


中文摘要 專利侵權之救濟途徑,除罪化已是世界趨勢,我國專利法歷經兩次修法全面除罪化後,迄今已逾十年。侵害專利是否構成犯罪,各國立法例固有不同之規範。惟科技發展日新月異,專利技術之占有成為產業獲利之決勝關鍵,專利權之獨占制度在經濟上具有極大之投資誘因,影響企業資金挹注之意願。從而,專利侵害問題亦由商業及法律問題,進一步演變成國際之政治問題,甚而影響一國之立法政策。專利侵權行為除罪化後,專利權人已不能以刑事訴訟手段尋求救濟;惟傳統上訴訟進行曠日費時,往往當事人贏了官司,卻已間接公開其商業上機密,造成無法回復之損害。專利制度是產業導向之一種政策工具,專利權獨占是經濟上極大之投資誘因,影響企業資金挹注之意願,決定資源流動的趨勢。故而,專利與產業科技、國家經濟發展實有密切的關聯。配合該重要性,更需有健全的專利保護制度,俾鼓勵發明創作,方對我國企業未來創新研發之誘因與知識經濟之發展有實質助益。 關鍵詞: 專利侵權, 民事救濟, 刑責, 除罪化, 仲裁

關鍵字

刑責 民事救濟 專利侵權 除罪化 仲裁

並列摘要


Abstract The remedies for the infringement of patent changed into decriminalization, which is the world trend. The Patent Law of Taiwan amended twice in the decade. There are different legal policies about whether patent infringement is crime. Technology is advancing rapidly, possession of patented technology is the key point determining how much of the industry profit. The exclusive right of patent is a great economic incentive on investment, affecting the willingness of companies to investment, as well as the resource flows. Therefore,the subject of patent infringement involved not only business law, but the international political issue. Finally, the legislators made judgments depending on social situation. The Patent Law has been fully decriminalization. The patentee cannot seek relief in accordance with the Criminal Procedure. However, the traditional proceedings are time-consuming. One party won the case, in the other hand, disclosed its commercial secrets with irreparable damages. Instead, arbitration is fast, effective and economical that might be a good method of the infringement of intellectual property rights issue. Patent system plays an important role in the scientific technology industry, it is our nation’s major goal to establish a perfect patent system so as to promote our technology industry. Key Words: Patent Infringement, Civil Remedies, Criminal Liability, Decriminalization, Arbitration

參考文獻


2. 黃章典,發明專利侵害之除罪化,理律雙月刊,頁7-9,民國90年7月號。
13. 蘇俊雄,刑法修正之理論與刑法改革運動,台大法學論叢,第22卷第1期,頁163-172,民國97年。
2. 最高行政法院90年度判字第1882號判決。
3. 最高法院30年上字第8號刑事判例。
7. 蔡瑞森,專利刑罰全面除罪化因應之道,智慧財產季刊,頁42-45,第45期。

延伸閱讀


國際替代計量