透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.191.236.174
  • 學位論文

芝山岩社區生態環境研究

The study of Zhishanyan community's ecological environment

指導教授 : 吳瑪悧

摘要


千禧年前後竣工的芝山岩文化史蹟公園嚴然是彼時台灣社會堪稱標竿的生態社區。直到2010年代,居民開始著重開發地產價值導向之建設及想像。不禁令研究者思考1990年代芝山岩文化史蹟公園與貓頭鷹之家成立的意義;故此延伸出三個問題意識:一、著眼於歷史的角度,理解芝山岩社區與其生態價值及意義如何逐漸形塑而成;二、社區的生態環境與人文社會是如何串連,進而失聯?三、社區應當如何永續發展,以利發展生態城市以及面對極端氣候的挑戰。並透過中華民國地區發展學會的倡議檢視芝山岩社區所具備的生態城市性質。 因而本研究之目的在於描繪出社區該如何形成一個兼顧生態環境與適宜城市發展的生態美學。生態美學之意義便在於承認非人行動者與人類並無二異。從而開發不再只是以利益為出發,而是關切到生態環境與人文社會之間的關係。在這樣的美學之下,居民開始以公共利益為出發,而不是個人利益。因而需要在一個具有匯聚公共議題的場所進行討論。故研究者將透過文獻回顧及參與觀察作為研究方法,嘗試爬梳兩件事:一、芝山岩文化史蹟公園成立之歷史,以及造成專家學者認定此一空間具有生態、文化等面向的價值;二、當代居民及政府是如何看待芝山岩社區的公共議題。進而,民眾與政府如何發展其生態環境價值。 理解公園成立的歷史,便可知道此一文化史蹟公園的生態價值及其意義是如何形塑的;當代社會之居民與政府如何觀看公共議題乃至於生態環境的態度,可以回應社區之生態環境與人文社會的串連與失聯,研究者認為社區民眾如何運用、看待區民活動中心,可以回過頭來檢視居民如何看待社區內的公園綠地。此外,研究者透過案例分析之爬梳,理解了其他社區是如何做的,而芝山岩社區之可能的解決方案便在其中。

並列摘要


The Zhishanyan Cultural and Historical Park, completed around 2000, was indisputably recognized as a benchmark for eco-communities in the society of Taiwan at the time. In the 2010s, local residents began to focus their attention on the development of real estate value-oriented construction and imagination. This transformation has prompted the researcher to contemplate the significance of the establishment of the Zhishanyan Cultural and Historical Park and the Owl House in the 1990s, and thus develop awareness of three problems: first, understanding how the Zhishanyan community and the ecological value and significance thereof were gradually shaped from a historical perspective; second, how the ecological environment and human society of the community were connected and subsequently became disconnected; third, how the community should work towards sustainable development to facilitate eco-city development and address the challenges of extreme weather. Further, the eco-city qualities of the Zhishanyan community are examined based on the initiative launched by the Association of Global Development, Taiwan.  Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to describe how the community should form an ecological aesthetics that is both favourable to the ecological environment and conductive to urban development. The significance of ecological aesthetics consists in the recognition that non-human actors are no different from human beings, whereby development no longer focuses solely on interests, but shows concern for the relationship between the ecological environment and the human society. Under the condition of such aesthetics, the residents began to act in the public interest, rather than pursuing personal interests, and, therefore, discussions need to be held at a venue where public issues are brought together. As such, through a literature review and the research method of participant observation, the researcher seeks to investigate the following two facets: first, the history of the Zhishanyan Cultural and Historical Park, as well as what has led experts and scholars to identify ecological, cultural, and other value in this space; second, how local residents and the government perceive the public issues in the Zhishanyan community, and further how the people and the government develop the value of its ecological environment.  How the ecological value and significance of the Zhishanyan Cultural and Historical Park were shaped can be known by understanding the history of its establishment. How the residents and the government of contemporary society view public issues and their attitudes towards the ecological environment can explain the connection and disconnection between the ecological environment and human society of the community. The researcher suggests that the way in which the community residents use and perceive the community centre can be understood by returning to examining how the residents view the green space of the park in their community. In addition, through a review of case studies, the researcher acquires an understanding of the practices implemented by other communities, among which the possible solution for the Zhishanyan community lies. 

參考文獻


參考書目
計畫報告
中華民國地區發展學會、國立高雄大學區域經濟與都市發展研究中心(2010a)。生態城市都市設計操作手冊之研究委託專業服務案成果報告,內政部營建署
(2010b)。生態城市都市設計操作手冊之研究委託專業服務案操作手冊,內政部營建署
台北市政府民政局(2003)。臺北市區民活動中心管理手冊,台北市政府民政局

延伸閱讀