從資源基礎觀點角度而言,專利權對企業的重要性是無疑的,唯產業界正熱衷申請專利之時,往往忽略專利可能也為企業帶來負面之效益,因此專利是否對企業績效有所助益顯然是一個值得探討的問題,過去學者的實證研究並不一致,台灣亦缺乏系統性的實證研究,基此,本研究擬以資源基礎觀點來探討專利與企業績效之關係。 本研究之目的係利用資源基礎理論推演專利權與企業績效之關係提出研究假設,以台灣1000大製造業為實證分析對象,來進行專利權與企業績效之系統性實證研究,以中華民國專利資料庫(TW)中2004-2007年之專利資料為研究範圍。研究結果顯示,台灣製造業其核准之專利權數與企業績效之營業收入、稅後純益有顯著的正相關,另發現知識密集程度越高的產業,專利數顯著高於其他產業。其中發明專利與企業績效之影響大於新型、新式樣專利,此現象可做為台灣製造業專利佈局之重要參考。
In accordance with Resources-based view, patents are important intangible assets for the enterprise, but these companies in manufacturing industry could be produce the negative effects with patents, and patents are worth exploring to discuss whether patents could increase the performance or not. We reviewed those researches in past and found that the results are inconsistent and the other researches in Taiwan are also deficient in systematic. Based on the above situation, this study will discuss the relationship between patents and business performance by Resources-based view. The purpose of this study explores the relationship between patent rights and business performance by Resources-based view. The analyzing samples of this study are the 1000 manufacturing companies in Taiwan, and we search these patent documents from 2004 to 2007. In the result we found that the relationship among performance, the quantities of patents, the business income and the after-tax profit are significantly positive correlation. We also found the quantities of patents of the high knowledge intensive industry are more than the other industries. The invention patent also effects business performance more higher than patents for the new model and the new type, the results is worth to pay attention for manufacturing industries in Taiwan.