透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.15.147.53
  • 學位論文

臺灣金融控股公司財務績效與競爭策略之研究

The Empirical Study on Financial Performance and Competitive Strategy of Financial Holding Companies in Taiwan

指導教授 : 謝俊宏
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


全球化的趨勢使得國際金融環境快速變遷,金融業更朝向自由化、國際化與大型化的趨勢邁進。而由於在2007年後美國次級房貸問題持續延燒,全球化的連鎖效應演變成百年一見之2008年全球金融海嘯,金融資產減損造成全球金融機構面臨虧損危機與倒閉潮,使得金控公司的資產市占率與獲利績效之排名重新洗牌,本研究主要以主成分分析與多元尺度分析法重新檢視金融海嘯後金控公司之財務績效,並探討究竟哪家金控公司充分掌握此次金融危機迅速壯大資產規模並回復獲利榮景,提升自身競爭力,在激烈地彼消我長的金控肉搏戰中勝出。 研究結果顯示:領導性金控具有高度佔有率、高度經濟規模、高獲利及優質財務結構等競爭優勢,計有富邦金控、國泰金控、元大金控、兆豐金控、開發金控等。中等潛力型金控擁有積極的經營策略與目標,想提高市場占有率與營運規模,計有中信金控、台新金控、新光金控、第一金控及華南金控等。市場追隨者計有國票金控、玉山金控、永豐金控、日盛金控等中小型弱勢金控。

並列摘要


The trend of globalization is drastically changing the international financial environment. The financial industry is undergoing trends of deregulation, internationalization, and scale enlargement. The subprime mortgage problem in United States in 2007 triggered a chain effect across the globe and it became clear that the impairment of financial assets was leading to economic losses and bankruptcies of financial institutes. Therefore, the ranking of the asset market share and profit performance has been reshuffled. This research reevaluated the financial performances of Financial Holding Companies (FHC) after the financial crisis by using Principal Component Analysis and Multidimensional Scaling methods. This research also investigated which of the FHCs are able to fully cope with the environment so that they can further enlarge their scale of assets, return to their former profitable states, and increase their competitiveness to win the intense financial battle. The results reveal that the leading FHCs possess the competitive advantages through their high market share, high economies of scale, high profitability and a solid capital structure. These are Fubon, Cathay, Yuanta, Mega and China Development (i). The intermediate potential FHCs exercise a goal-oriented, active management strategy and are eager to increase their market share and scale of operations. These are Chinatrust, Taishin, Shin Kong, First and Hua Nan (ii). The following FHCs are the weaker ones and are of a small to medium scale FHCs such as Waterland, E.Sun, SinoPac and Jih Sun (iii).

參考文獻


5、 沈中華(2002),「金控公司的銀行與獨立銀行CAMEL比較:1997- 1998」,台灣金融財務季刊第三輯第二期。
21、湯志彬(2005),「國內金融控股公司經營績效評估之研究」,銘傳
電信業者為例」,國立台中科技大學企業管理系事業經營研究所碩士
3、 呂芳睦(2007),「金控經營綜效分析-以第一銀行為例」,國立成
9、 林俐均(2006),「應用多重比較方法評鑑台灣金控公司之財務績

延伸閱讀