透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.117.142.128
  • 學位論文

壓瘡防護流程介入對降低手術病人壓瘡之成效分析

Pressure Ulcer Prevention Procedure on Reducing Incidence and Rank of Pressure Ulcer in Patients with Surgery

指導教授 : 高家常

摘要


研究背景:壓瘡(pressure ulcer)是臨床照護重要的品質指標之一。手術中壓瘡占所有壓瘡發生率之12-66%,手術中壓瘡除了增加病患住院天數與醫療成本外,也衝擊醫院的醫療照護品質。 研究目的: 探討手術中壓瘡防護流程介入對降低手術中壓瘡發生率與壓瘡等級之成效。 研究方法: 採病歷回溯方式收集在南部某一教學醫院之手術室比較手術中壓瘡防護流程介入前三個月(n= 101)與後三個月(n= 130)的壓瘡發生率與壓瘡等級。 選擇標準為:20歲以上、採全身麻醉、手術時間大於或等於四小時、接受耳鼻喉科進行頭頸部腫瘤切除後整形外科再以顯微手術將血管及游離皮瓣縫合的病人,或是神經外科行腰椎融合-後融合採俯臥手術的病人、手術前沒有壓瘡。資料分析包括:人口統計學、疾病史和手術相關因素,分析方法有描述性統計、卡方檢定、t-tests、ANOVAs。 研究結果: 介入前後兩組與六組之間在年齡、性別、Hct、Hb、BMI、手術時間、手術姿勢(平躺或俯臥)、慢性疾病(高血壓、糖尿病)等變項沒有顯著差異。手術中壓瘡防護流程(PUPP)介入前三個月的壓瘡發生率依序為: 9.5% (2/42),3.7%(1/27),6.3%(2/32);手術中壓瘡防護流程(PUPP)介入後三個月的壓瘡發生率,依序為: 25.0%(9/36),17.0%(8/47),8.50%(4/47)。執行PUPP前4.95% (5/101)較執行後16.2%(21/130) 的壓瘡發生率顯著增加(Chi-square=5.70,p =0.03);但六組間並無顯著差異。PUPP介入前壓瘡等級中一級有3位,二級1位,三級1位; PUPP介入後壓瘡等級下降,皆為一級。 結論:手術中壓瘡防護流程(PUPP)介入可以降低手術中壓瘡發生率與壓瘡等級。

並列摘要


Background: Pressure ulcer (PU) is a quality indicator in healthcare organizations. PU does not only elevate health costs but also threats medical quality. About 12-66 % of peri-operative patients may experience PU. Objective: The objective of the study was to compare the incidences of PU between before and after implementation of the pressure ulcer prevention procedure (PUPP) in patients receiving surgery. Methods: This study was a comparison with retrospective research design. Data were collected from medical records 3-month before (BI, n=101) and 3-month after (AI, n=130) implementation of the PUPP at a hospital in southern Taiwan. PUPP was a standard of operation procedure developing for reducing perioperative PU. Subjects were above 20-years old, receiving a Microsurgical Reconstruction in Head Neck Using Free Flaps or a Spinal Posterior Surgery, at least 240 minutes of time of surgery and no PU occurrence before surgery. Data included demographics, disease history, and operation attritions. Analytical strategy included descriptive statistics, Chi-square, t-tests, and ANOVAs. Results: There were no significant differences in age, gender, Hct, Hb, BMI, time of surgery, surgical position (supine/prone), and chronic disease (Diabetes Mellitus/hypertension) between AI and BI groups and cross the six months. The incidence of the PU at the consequent months were 9.5%(2/42), 3.7%(/127), 6.3%(2/32), 25.0%(9/36), 17.0%(8/47), and 8.5% (4/47). The incidence of PU of AI (4.95% [5/101] was higher than those of BO (16.2% [21/130]; Chi-square=5.70, p =0.03). All the PU in the AI group demonstrated at rank I (n=21); whereas, those in the BI group demonstrated at rank I (n=3) and rank II and III each (n=1). Conclusion: PUPP is promise of effective for this study. Continue studying on PUPP to prevent the incidence and rank of PUPP is need.

參考文獻


李文怡、藺寶珍、翁嘉杏、林怡伶、蔡文苓(2012)。降低長時間俯臥手術臉部壓 瘡發生率之專案。護理雜誌,59(3),70-78。
吳雪雯、郭俐伶、陳華蓁、張德馨(2014) 。降低口腔癌手術病人鼻翼皮膚損傷 發生率。馬偕護理雜誌,8(1)),51-61。
周繡玲、楊立華、馮容芬(2009)。建立傷口照護標準-以壓瘡傷口為例。亞東學報,29,243~256。
張昭惠、陳慧玲、陳香祺(2007)。降低神經外科手術患者壓瘡發生率之方案。護理雜誌,54(6) ,53-60。
黃瑞珍、潘書嬪、黃怡慈、陳淑華(2011)。提昇手術病人擺位安全照護正確性之專案。護理雜誌,58(6),82-89。

被引用紀錄


王文珊(2017)。壓瘡發生原因探討-以某地區醫院內科病房為例〔碩士論文,義守大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0074-1406201718444900

延伸閱讀