透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.16.66.156
  • 學位論文

兩岸司法互信機制---以共同執行打擊犯罪為例

Strait Judicial Mutual Trust Mechanism --- Taking Joint Implementation of Fights Against Crimes as an Example

指導教授 : 吳有龍

摘要


『互信機制』的名詞理論雖然發源自西方,但在中國的歷史上卻不乏類似實踐例子,本研究試圖透過中外信心建立措施的發展及內涵,在兩岸進行司法互助合作與共同打擊犯罪上,能否以歷史作為借鏡及探討如何暫時擱置主權的爭議,務實地發展兩岸關係。 研究結果指出兩岸若將『互信機制』以廣義的定義來界定,採非軍事性與軍事性議題併行,交換彼此意見來共同處理安全方面的問題,從而達成相當程度的協議,這些都有助於兩岸政治僵局的化解與雙方企求和平的如願。在落實兩岸在共同打擊犯罪上的共識與成效方面,建議如下:一、建立溝通管道落實共同打擊犯罪機制,二、落實兩岸司法互助協議,三、以共同安全化解政治僵局,四、循序漸進共創雙贏局面。

並列摘要


Although the term theory of "Mutual trust mechanism" originated from the West, there are many similar examples in the history of China. This study attempts to establish mutual legal assistance and cooperation in cross-strait through the development and connotation of measures to establish measures through Chinese and foreign confidence. On the basis of whether history can be used as a mirror and how to temporarily suspend sovereignty disputes and pragmatically develop cross-strait relationships. The research results point out that cross-strait defines the "Mutual trust mechanism" in a broad definition, adopts non-military and military issues in parallel, exchanges opinions with each other to jointly deal with security issues, and thus achieves a considerable degree of agreement. Helping the resolution of the cross-strait political deadlock and the desire of both sides to seek peace. In implementing the consensus and effectiveness of cross-strait in joint crime prevention, the recommendations are as follows: 1. Establish a communication channel to implement a joint crackdown mechanism, 2. Implement a cross-strait mutual legal assistance agreement, and 3. Use a common security solution to resolve the political deadlock. Step by step to create a win-win situation.

參考文獻


一、中文參考文獻
鈕先鍾(1999)。二十一世紀的戰略前瞻。1999年8月。178。
薛絢(2001)。競爭的極限。2001年10月。9。
朱張碧珠(1995)。國際關係。1995年2月。122。
黃裕美(2002)。文明衝突與世界秩序的重建。2002年7月。5-15。

延伸閱讀