目的:探討安寧共同照護模式於癌症病人生活品質、憂鬱程度及靈性需求之成效 方法:採類實驗,前、後測設計,於南部某一區域醫院之癌症末期病人、年滿 20 歲,同意參與研究者為收案條件。提供研究對象 (N=30) 每週 2~3 次訪視,為期二週的安寧共同照護。問卷資料包括基本資料、中文版癌症生活品質核心問卷、台灣憂鬱量表、中文版癌症患者靈性需求量表。以描述性統計及廣義線性模式分析資料。 結果:在接受共照後生活品質之功能構面後測(Mean ± SD = 56.50 ± 5.81)低於前測(Mean ± SD = 69.17 ± 9.52, p <0.001)。症狀面構面後測(Mean ± SD = 52.57 ± 5.47)低於前測(Mean ± SD = 63.42 ± 9.28, p <0.001)。整體健康生活品質後測(Mean ± SD = 71.19 ± 15.86)高於前測(Mean ± SD = 41.67 ± 11.73, p <0.001)。憂鬱程度後測(Mean ± SD = 12.87 ± 4.91)低於前測(Mean ± SD = 28.97 ± 8.54, p <0.001)。整體靈性需求後測(Mean ± SD = 3.03 ± 0.47)高於前測(Mean ± SD = 1.48 ± 0.86, p <0.001)。 結論:安寧共同照護模式介入可以在症狀面、整體健康生活品質、憂鬱程度及靈性需求有改善,但於功能構面未提升。
Purpose: The study was performed to assess the effects of hospice shared-care model on quality of life, depressive levels, and spiritual needs for patients with cancer. Methods: This study adopted a quasi-experimental design with a single group using the comparison between a 2-week interval at a regional and teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. Inclusion criteria included patients (N=30) who aged over 20 and agreed to participate in the study. The questionnaires used for the study included personal information, the Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chinese version (QLQ-C30), the Taiwanese Depression Scale (TDQ), and Chinese Version of Spiritual Interests Related to Illness Tool (C-SpIRIT). Data strategies were descriptive statistics and generalized estimating equation. Results: After the 2-week intervention, the scores showed significant differences between pre-test and post-test in the following subscales: the QLQ-C30:(1) the functional subscale (Mean ± SD = 69.17 ± 9.52 vs. 56.50 ± 5.81, p < 0.001) , (2) the symptoms subscale (Mean ± SD = 63.42 ± 9.28 vs. 52.57 ± 5.47, p < 0.001) , and (3) the global health status (Mean ± SD = 41.67 ± 11.73 vs. 71.19 ± 15.86, p < 0.001) , the overall TDQ scale (Mean ± SD = 28.97 ± 8.54 vs. 12.87 ± 4.91, p < 0.001), and the overall C-SpIRIT scale (Mean ± SD = 1.48 ± 0.86 vs. 3.03 ± 0.47, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The hospice shared-care model is beneficial to improve the symptoms and global physical conditions of quality of life, depressive levels, and spiritual needs on patients with cancer, but it doesn’t seem to be beneficial to the functional status of quality of life.