透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.118.210.213
  • 學位論文

貨幣政策及奢侈稅對營建股價短期影響之研究

The Impact of Monetary Policy and Luxury Tax on the Short Term Construction Stock Price

指導教授 : 周宗南 鄭廳宜
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


本研究期間取自2010年6月25日至2011年6月11日止,財政部宣告實施奢侈稅之上市營建股為對象,比較中央銀行調高利率與財政部宣告實施奢侈稅對營建股短期股價之反應,並作差異之比較。 實證結果指出:(1)縱使實質利率為負,在中央銀行第一次調高利率後之宣告效果,對營建股股價會有相當之衝擊而產生負的異常報酬率。(2)財政部課徵奢侈稅的消息一出後營建股股價產生負的異常報酬率。這說明在財政部預擬實施奢侈稅之前已有些投資者知悉政府實施奢侈稅之決心,造成營建股股價先行下跌。(3) 財政部課徵奢侈稅營建股股價產生負的異常報酬率絕對值大於央行調高利率後,營建股股價產生負的異常報酬率。(4) 中央銀行第一次調高利率後,營建股股價產生負的異常報酬率絕對值大於中央銀行第二、第三與第四次調高利率後,營建股股價產生負的異常報酬率(5)財政部於2011年6月1日正式實施奢侈稅時,營建股股價先行反應此利空的衝擊。

並列摘要


This study covers the period from June 25, 2010 to June 11, 2011 and the samples are selected on the basis of the companies listed in construction sector of TAIEX while the Ministry of Finance announced the luxury tax. We examine the effects of the implementation of the luxury tax and the raised interest rates by the Central Bank on stock prices and evaluate their short-term performances. Empirical results indicate that: (1) Even though real interest rates was negative, the stock prices of construction sector experienced negative abnormal returns since the Central Bank first raised interest rates. (2) The stock prices of construction sector yielded negative abnormal returns after the imposition of luxury tax announced by the Ministry of Finance. This result showed that investors noticed the government''s determination to implement a luxury tax before the Ministry of Finance schemed out the luxury tax and then resulted in construction stocks fall ahead. (3) The negative abnormal returns in absolute value caused by luxury tax were higher than those of raising interest rates. (4) The negative abnormal returns in absolute value of construction sector generated by the central bank raised interest rates for the first time were greater than the values for the second, third and fourth interest increases. (5) In respond to the official implementation of the luxury tax by the Ministry of Finance on June 1, 2011, the stock prices of construction sector responded earlier to the impact of the bad news.

參考文獻


4、杜美勳(2004),中央銀行貨幣政策與股價指數報酬相關性之研究,台灣大學政府與公共事務研究所碩士論文。
8、俞海琴與張錫杰(1993) ,台灣地區股價與匯率、利率互動關係之研究—向量自我迴歸模式之應用,中原學報,第22卷,PP.177-191。
19、陳隆麒與李文雄(1998),台灣地區房價、股價、利率互動關係之研究—聯立方程模式與向量自我迴歸模型之應用,財務金融學刋,5,51-71。
10、翁小蘅(2009),新台幣匯率、利率與股價報酬率關聯性之研究,台北大學國際財務金融研究所碩士論文。
16、楊美玲(2011),當高房價遇上奢侈稅:垃圾桶決策模式之分析,台灣大學政府與公共事務研究所碩士論文。

被引用紀錄


江怡蘭(2015)。政府打房措施對上市(櫃)營建股之影響〔碩士論文,淡江大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://doi.org/10.6846/TKU.2015.00685
蔡祐彰(2013)。我國奢侈稅之建制基礎與施行檢討〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314041908
陳旻辰(2013)。奢侈稅實施對土地增值稅影響之研究〔碩士論文,朝陽科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0078-2712201314042883
張雅琪(2013)。課徵奢侈稅對不動產投資信託基金及營建股之影響〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0023-2007201317505600
顏士寅(2016)。政府財政政策和貨幣政策打房對相關營建類股之影響〔碩士論文,國立虎尾科技大學〕。華藝線上圖書館。https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail?DocID=U0028-2405201620034800

延伸閱讀