透過您的圖書館登入
IP:3.140.185.147
  • 學位論文

建築工程施工查核品質缺失扣點紀錄表調整建議之研究

A survey study of adjustment suggestion for quality inspection scoring system of public building construction projects

指導教授 : 鄭道明
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


公共工程建設為促進國家競爭力的重要因素之ㄧ,公共工程委員會為加強工程品質之提昇而訂定「公共工程施工品質管理制度」,並於2002年執行工程查核作業,使參與實際工程所有成員(業主、監造顧問及施工商承商),均能體認工程品質之重要性。 本研究主要是蒐集台中縣政府96-97年度52件建築工程查核案件,針對查核表中委員所記錄之界定不清或選項不明確的其他缺失項目經過重新對應後將其對應至正確相關的缺失項目中或將查核表中缺失明細內容文字略加修飾和增修後,於查核上發見之其他缺失問題完全對應至符合查核缺失選項中,最後經本研究對於其他缺失重新對應後分析出,主辦機關其他缺失由22次減少為1次、監造及承攬單位其他缺失分別由26次及24次完全對應至相關缺失、施工品質強度(I)其他缺失由61次減少為2次、強度(II)以及安全其他缺失分別由為37次、39次完全對應至相關缺失。

並列摘要


Public construction engineering is one of the significant elements to enhance the national competitiveness. In order to strengthen and improve the engineering quality, the Public Construction Commission had enacted “System of Quality Management for Public Engineering Construction” and began to execute the inspection since 2002, which aimed to make all the parties participating in the actual engineering work, including the principals, construction advisors, and contractors, recognize the importance of engineering quality. This study collected a total of 52 inspection cases of Taichung County Government between 2007 and 2008, and collated the data in the checklist about other flaws which inspectors failed to well indentify or the choices were not precisely defined. After correcting all the mistakes and misplaced errors as well as slightly modifying the contents and words, this study discovered that the number of other flaws for agencies reduced to 1 from 22; the numbers of other flaws for construction supervisors and contractors, which were 26 and 24 respectively, returned zero while they were completely relocated to relevant flaw items; the number of other flaws for construction quality and intensity reduced to 2 from 61; the number of other flaws for intensity and safety, which were 37 and 39 respectively, returned zero while they were completely relocated to relevant flaw items.

參考文獻


11.廖昶然,「公共工程施工品質事後審計成效之探討-以審計機關查核機制為例」,碩士論文,國立中央大學土木工程系,桃園,2007。
1.H. Abdel-Razek., “QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN EGYPT: METHODOLOGY AND IMPLEMENTATION,” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, ASCE, pp.354-360,1998.
4.Abdel-Razek, R. H., ”How construction managers would like their performance to be evaluated.” J. Constr. Engrg. and Mgmt., ASCE, pp.280-286,1997.
5.Almaraz, J. “Quality management and the process of change,” Journal of Organization Change Management, 7(2), pp.6-14,1994.
7.Deming, W. E., Out of the crisis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Center for advanced Engineering Study,1986.

延伸閱讀