運用權利變換機制促進民間自主推動編定工業區更新再生 之可行性研究

Feasibility of Right Transfer for Promoting Private Initiation of Designated Industrial Park Regeneration

王屹峯(Yi-Fong Wang)

指導教授 ： 周慧瑜

朝陽科技大學/理工學院/營建工程系碩士在職專班/碩士(2010年)

摘要

自民國49年起經濟部工業局陸續編定開發工業區，隨著時代變遷產業結構的轉型，目前各編定工業區已陸續面臨老舊與不符合現代廠商多元型態需求之情形。近年來工業局亦積極推動編定工業區的更新再生計畫，然而由於區內土地絕大部分皆為私有，因此目前更新再生仍較侷限於硬體設施的更新，難以進一步進行較大規模的整體更新；加上各編定工業區發展背景與進駐產業類型不同，廠商各有不同的營運發展方向與計畫，因此若要有效促進編定工業區的全面更新發展，引導民間廠商自發性的啟動更新再生計畫才是可行。

然而，目前編定工業區更新主要法規「產業創新條例」中缺乏更新再生相關規定，另外亦缺乏使土地產權重新調整分配，以解決土地私有僵化之權利變換機制。而權利變換機制之擬定，雖可參考我國都市更新條例中之權利變換機制，但都市更新與編定工業區更新再生計畫中之權利變換需求情形實際上有著本質上的不同，並非可全然直接地套用於我國編定工業區上。本研究即針對編定工業區施行更新再生權利變換使用之實際需求情形，參照目前我國都市更新條例之權利變換機制與日本都市再開發法之權利變換機制，以尋求一可適用於編定之權利變換機制。

本研究建議未來產業創新條例增訂子法時，應增設權利變換制度與獎勵參與更新再生之相關誘因機制，包括針對劃定緊急整備區域，給予特別更新獎助、放寬土地使用限制、設立更新開發補助金、容積獎勵、稅捐融資優惠並補助參與更新再生之營運損失。並增設更新再生專案小組，協助推行編定工業區更新再生，以促進民間自主推動編定工業區之更新再生。

關鍵字

編定工業區 ； 權利變換 ； 更新再生

並列摘要

Since 1960, the Industrial Development Bureau (IDB), MOEA, has designated and developed industrial parks in succession. As the times change and industrial structures transform, now, each designated industrial park has in succession encountered the situations such as shabbiness, not conforming to modern companies’ diversified types of needs. During recent years, the Industrial Development Bureau has also been actively promoting the renewal and regeneration projects for designated industrial parks. However, because most of the land within these parks is private-owned, the renewal and regeneration is still limited to the renewal of hardware facilities at present. Large-scaled holistic renewal is hard to be implemented further. In addition, each designated industrial park has different development backgrounds and residing industry types, and every company has its own different directions and plans for operation development. Thus, for effectively facilitating the overall renewal and development of designated industrial parks, the feasible way is to guide civil companies to activate the renewal and regeneration projects spontaneously.

However, in the current statute “Industrial Innovation Act” mainly for the renewal of designated industrial parks, there lack the stipulations related to renewal and regeneration. It also lacks the property right exchange mechanism in which the property rights of land can be readjusted and redistributed to solve the rigidity of land privatization. Although such a property right exchange mechanism can be drawn up by means of reference to the property right exchange mechanism in our country’s Urban Renewal Act, however, the situations of the needs for property right exchange in urban renewals and in the renewal and regeneration projects for designated industrial parks are actually different in essence, which can not be applied to the designated industrial parks in our country directly and totally. Aimed at the situations of actual needs for applications of property right exchange in the implementation of the renewal and regeneration for designated industrial parks, this study referred to the current property right exchange mechanism in our country’s Urban Renewal Act, as well as the property right exchange mechanism in Japan’s Urban Redevelopment Act, in order to seek for a property right exchange mechanism applicable to designation.

The suggestions in this study were: When any sub-statute to the Industrial Innovation Act is enacted in the future, the property right exchange system as well as related incentive mechanisms for encouraging the participation in renewal and regeneration should be set up additionally, including providing special renewal prize-rewards aimed at the delimited areas for emergent preparation, loosening the restrictions on land use, setting up subsidies for renewal and development, providing zoning bonus and tax finance preference; also, the operation loss deriving from the participation in renewal and regeneration should be subsidized. Besides, a panel for the renewal and regeneration projects should be set up additionally, to assist the designated industrial parks in implementing renewal and regeneration, so as to facilitate the renewal and regeneration of designated industrial parks promoted spontaneously by the non-governmental circles.

並列關鍵字

renewal and regeneration ； property right exchange ； designated industrial park

參考文獻

4. 行政院公共工程委員會，「DBFO模式在我國運用之研究」，行政院公共工程委員會，臺北，2004。

9. 洪任遠，「都市更新與少數之權利人保護」，碩士論文，國立臺灣大學法律學院法律學系，臺北，2008。

13. 都市更新研究發展基金會，「都市再生密碼」，都市更新研究發展基金會，2006。

16. 黃國堅，「以權利變換方式推行都市更新產權處理之研究」，碩士論文，政治大學地政研究所，臺北，1988。

18. 楊靜玟，「以財務機制觀點評估市中心再發展政策之研究」，碩士論文，成功大學都市計畫研究所，臺南，2006。