本研究旨在探討國民小學學童知覺父母教養方式、教師管教方式及挫折容忍力之現況,探討父母教養方式、教師管教方式與挫折容忍力的關係,並考驗父母教養方式、教師管教方式對挫折容忍力之預測情形。以臺中市國民小學四、六年級學童575人為研究對象,進行問卷調查,依據研究者所編制的「父母教養方式問卷」、「教師管教方式問卷」及「挫折容忍力問卷」為研究工具,所得資料以算數平均數、標準差、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關、及多元迴歸等統計方法進行資料分析,歸納結論如下:一、學童所知覺的父母教養方式會因年級、性別、家庭子女數、出生序及家庭結構等背景條件而有所差異。二、教師管教方式上,「支持型」最常運用,「協商型」次之。三、國小學童整體挫折容忍力為中等以上程度。四、父母教養方式、教師管教方式與挫折容忍力有顯著相關。五、父母教養方式對挫折容忍力具預測力。六、「支持型」、「妥協型」與「協商型」的教師管教方式對挫折容忍力具預測力。
The purpose of the study was to explore the relationships among the parenting styles, teaching styles and frustration tolerance. Moreover, examine the predictability among parenting styles, teaching styles and frustration tolerance of the students in elementary schools. Scales were adopted, the scales of the Parenting Styles Scale, Teaching Styles Scale and Frustration Tolerance Scale. Data were collected from 575 fourth-grade and sixth-grade students. Descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson’s product-moment correlation, and multiple stepwise regression were utilized in the study. The findings of this study were as follows: 1. The parenting style was significantly related to grade, gender, numbers of children, birth order , and family structure. 2. “Supporting” was most commonly used in teaching styles, followed by “Negotiating”. 3. The frustration tolerance of students was intermediate level. 4. There was significant relations between parenting styles, teaching styles and frustration tolerance. 5. Parenting styles had good predictions to frustration tolerance . 6. The “supporting”, “compromising” and “negotiating” of teaching styles had good predictions to frustration tolerance .