透過您的圖書館登入
IP:18.223.119.17
  • 學位論文

銀行融資之關鍵影響因素-以台灣資訊電子產業為例

Key Influence Factors of Bank Financing: The Evidence of Taiwan's Information Electronics Industry

指導教授 : 林盈利
若您是本文的作者,可授權文章由華藝線上圖書館中協助推廣。

摘要


銀行在金融市場中扮演相當重要的角色,雖然公司籌措資金的管道相 當多元化,但就降低融資風險而言,間接金融優於直接金融,故間接金融 仍為公司取得資金的重要管道。此外,由於銀行放款對象主要以民營公司 為主,隱含銀行與公司之間存在著高度的相互依存關係,然而,公司能否 取得銀行貸款取決於許多關鍵因素,因此,本研究擬深入探討影響公司之 銀行借款集中度之關鍵因素。 本研究以台灣資訊電子產業上市公司為樣本,由於台灣資訊電子產業具 有完整的上中下游產業價值鏈,不同價值鏈階段具有不同營運特性,故本 研究分析不同價值鏈階段下,影響公司之銀行借款集中度之關鍵因素,研 究結果發現資訊不對稱與有形資產、營業利益、負債比率等公司特性顯著 影響銀行借款集中度,同時,不同價值鏈階段無顯著差異。此外,不論公 司屬於上、中或下游產業,從公司設立開始,皆會陸續經歷成長期、成熟 期及衰退期等三階段,故本研究進一步探討公司在不同生命週期階段下, 影響銀行借款集中度之關鍵因素,研究結果發現主要影響銀行借款集中度 之因素為有形資產與負債比率,而成熟期與衰退期影響銀行借款集中度之 因素相似。 藉由本研究之研究結果,銀行可瞭解公司特性、資訊不對稱與銀行借 款集中度之關聯性,進而作為評估放款的參考,以降低監督成本及控制違 約風險;此外,不同價值鏈階段及不同生命週期之公司亦可瞭解如何因應 營運特性,制訂適當決策,以順利取得銀行資金。

並列摘要


The research is focused on information and electronic companies listed in Taiwan during the period 1998 to 2007, which are classified in accordance with their industrial value chain, i.e., upstream, midstream and downstream companies. This research use the value chain analysis of information electronics industry for key influence factors of bank financing. The evidence shows that the factors of tangible assets, profit, total debt and asymmetric information have significant influence for bank debt concentration. There is no significant difference at different value chains stage. Moreover, in order to increase the value of corporate and achieve sustainable management, firms should set up appropriate business strategy accounting to various exterior environment and inner condition at each stage of development process. This research use the life cycle theory for key influence factors of bank financing. Empirical result show influence factors of bank debt concentration are tangible assets and total debt. It is similar to influence the factor of bank debt concentration in mature stage and decline stage.

參考文獻


1. 古永嘉、鄭敏聰、游佳鈴,2005,台灣資訊電子業上市公司融資決策順位之研-Ordered-logistic迴歸模式之應用,輔仁管理評論,第十二卷第三期,頁41-70。
1. Anthony, J.H. and Ramesh, K., 1992, Association between Accounting Performance Measures and Stock Prices, Journal of Accounting and Economics,15, pp. 203-227.
2. Beldona, S.R., Chaganti, M., Habib, M. and Inkpen, A.C., 1997, Industry Variety, Life - Cycle Stages, and Performance: A Dynamic Perspective, Competitive Intelligence Review,8, pp. 65-74.
3. Betz, F., 1993, Strategic Technology Management, McGraw-Hill.
4. Black, E.L., 1998, Which is More Value Relevant: Earnings or Cash Flows? A Life Cycle Examination, Journal of Financial Statement Analysts, 2, pp. 40-56.

延伸閱讀